22/09/2018

Generation Wealth




“Generation Wealth” is a multi-platform project that Lauren Greenfield has been working on since 2008, and is being released in 2017 as a museum exhibition, a photographic monograph, and a documentary film. Lauren Greenfield’s “Generation Wealth” is an extraordinary visual history of our growing obsession with wealth.

Through riveting first-person interviews, Greenfield’s journey starts in Los Angeles and spreads across America  and beyond, as she documents how we export the values of materialism, celebrity culture, and social status to every corner of the globe. We embark on this journey with Greenfield as she travels the world – from Los Angeles to Moscow, Dubai to China –  bearing witness to the global boom-and–bust economy and documenting its complicated consequences.

We hear the stories of students, single parents, and families overwhelmed by crushing debt, yet determined to purchase luxury houses, cars, and clothing. We visit the homes and observe the rituals of the international elite—from Bel-Air to Monaco, Russia to China. We gain intimate access into the lives of those that rose to extraordinary wealth and then lost “big” during the global economic crash of 2008. And we encounter the A-list celebrities we follow on reality TV and social media, the same influencers who shape our consumer desires and sense of self.

Provoking serious reflection, “Generation Wealth” is not about the rich, but about the desire to be wealthy, at any cost.









You’ve said that Generation Wealth is not about the rich, but about the influence of affluence. Can you tell us more about what that means?

LG : It’s really about the aspiration to wealth and how this has become part of the American Dream, as well as how that dream and those values have also been exported internationally. I say it’s not about wealth for two reasons. One is, a lot of people in the book are not actually wealthy. The project is very diverse and that’s kind of the point – to see how these similar behaviors and influences are affecting everyone, from children to old people, from LA to New York, from Iceland to Ireland to Dubai to Russia to China. And secondly, it’s really about the addictive quality of consumerism, which is a kind of striving that happens at any level.

What was the most significant change that you observed over these 25 years of work?

LG : One of the things that happened over this time was that people started having a vertical reference group rather than a horizontal reference group. So, people used to compare themselves to their neighbors, and that was kind of the root of “keeping up with the Joneses,” the notion of comparing yourself to the neighbor that had a little bit more than you did. Then we started spending more time with the media and with people on TV than with our neighbors, and actually feeling like we knew those people better than our neighbors, so “keeping up with the Joneses” literally becomes “keeping up with the Kardashians” in the age of reality TV.

The effect of seeing affluent lifestyles on television has been proven to a) make people think more people have that kind of lifestyle than really do, so it’s a distorted view of what’s normal but b) it also stimulates desire for those things. Mix that with the ability to get credit without regard to your ability to pay it back, and you have a situation where people are living out these fantasies.
But, back to your first question, the rich are also in Generation Wealth and they’re important because they have a disproportionate influence, but the meat of the book is the fact that this is what we all want. It’s not limited to the 1% which is this very small group. In America, people don’t resent the rich because they always imagine that it will be them someday. It’s about aspiration.



Your book does serve to de-glamorize the rich and pursuit of riches, and yet, we’re all still hypnotized by looking at your images. Does that say something about the extent of our fixation?

LG : I like using laughter as a way in for storytelling. I like the surprise or the unexpected journey of thinking it’s going to be one thing and then realizing it’s another. For example, the viral spot I made #likeagirl. It starts out with laughing, as the way people imitate girls running or girls fighting, and it’s kind of funny, because it also feels low stakes, like, what does it really matter? But then as the spot progresses, you start off laughing and end up crying and I think it allows you to get in and engage, and also want to take the time to have the experience. Then, you see it for what it is, and that has another effect.

With Generation Wealth, the book is bound in gold silk, so it’s like this beautiful, luxurious object that you want to have, which is ironic. I’ve always kind of worked that way, and I like black humor. I’ve worked with very bright, saturated colors and used the language of the popular culture – whether that was sexy bodies or bright lights or provocative, dynamic pictures – to bring the viewer into the story.

But part of the reason why I also include the interviews in the book is because sometimes the text belie the images. For example, Mijanou, who’s the girl on the cover of Fast Forward. She’s this beautiful girl, there are all these convertibles at the beach and, especially for Europeans, it’s kind of like the Californian dream. But then when you read her interview, you see that she’s struggling to keep up in that world because she doesn’t have the money that the other kids do, and she actually uses beauty in a way as currency to get into that popular crowd, and that has a kind of traumatic effect.

So, I think it’s good that people are drawn and repulsed by the images, and I hope that inspires the same examination of our own attractions to things. Like when I go into a store, I’ll be attracted to the posters or the packaging or the bags – those things are made to have that effect. What I’m trying to do is to also have the ability to see that, and deconstruct what’s around us and the effect that’s having on us… But of course that doesn’t take away that effect.

The Influence  of affluence : an interview with Lauren Greenfield. By Katherine Oktober Matthews. Gup Magazine,  March 15, 2017.





On the book :  The Photographer Behind an Unflinching Study of Wealth. By Gemma Padley. Another Magazine ,  May 22, 2017




This is one of several documentaries at the festival trying to deal with this new moment that we’re in with regards to Internet/Instagram celebrity and the societal shift away from hard work toward this anxiety and “hard work” about projecting the right image. Your practice isn’t exactly Marxist, but how would you describe that you’re looking at this , 

L G : Well, I want to see what movies you’re talking about. I did see Eighth Grade, which I loved. I think this work is very critical of capitalism. I studied economics and sociology and anthropology, and some of my perspective on this comes from that, but it’s a little bit more of seeing over the last 25 years how our form of capitalism has become an addictive quality of consumerism, which I guess Marx did sort of predict in the continual expansion. I’ve looked at it from a more psychological perspective, comparing it to addiction and addiction being something that comes from trying to numb pain. So I think at the heart of it we’ve lost sight of our values and, in a way, our connections to other people. Our families, our communities, what matters. I’m not really prescribing anything else. I don’t know what the answer is, except that I do think we need to wake to the forces affecting us, which we’re not always conscious of.

I feel like so much of it is this begrudging acceptance: “I hate Facebook, but I’m on it anyway.” What you’re trying to do to with this film is think about it critically and constructively and not just go along with it. Because it is tied to a large, career-spanning retrospective and book also titled Generation Wealth, at what point did you decide to insert yourself and your family into the film Generation Wealth?

LG : I started with the project of the book. When the crash happened, it become a morality tale about the way we had been living and seemed like the consequences were the natural result that we were going to learn from. Then we didn’t really learn from it. So, I started going back through my work and feeling like I needed to process it in a different way. When The Queen of Versailles was finished in 2012, I threw myself into that full time and started the process of going back through my work and also making new work to tell the story of “generation wealth,” and how we have changed. When I went back, I realized at the time I had worked and the subjects I had covered were not just my own personal trajectory but were tied to these seismic shifts in our culture, which I’d been there to document without fully knowing what they meant. I felt like I needed to put this journey in a historical context and bring it all together.

At the same time, I was the connective thread because I was hopping from eating disorders to Russian society to new wealth in China; if you just looked at all these subjects you would not think they were connected. But I really felt like there was a connection about where we had come to in this end-of-empire kind of feeling, like the fall of Rome. It seemed like we were on an unsustainable path. I started bringing it together as a narrator, but along the way the personal started to become relevant. I think it’s because I want to be honest and transparent about my own process as an artist, that I’m somebody that is also in the culture and interacting with it in different ways.

I would talk to someone like Florian Homm [an investment banker charged with $200 million in fraud] who would tell to me about how he destroyed the relationships with his family by five hundred [business] phone calls a day. An extreme example, much more extreme than my own, but I could relate. I was on four-week trips away from my own family regularly, so it just started a process of me looking at that as well. So it evolved in a way I didn’t want to include in the beginning, and I just started seeing it as important to the storytelling.


What do you think work means at this point in history? You bring up someone like Florian Homm, who sometimes seems like he’s actually repentant and other times it’s so obvious that if he could go back to that life by pressing a button, he would do it.

LG : That’s a really hard question because work really brings meaning to my life. I think that’s what I learned from my parents: that work was a passion and was a privilege. I think that to get to do work that you like is a huge privilege and something that is a rarity. I think part of what makes work meaningful is feeling like you’re making a difference and that was also really important to my parents—doing something for the common good. I think what was so soul-killing about Florian’s work is that it was predatory. Like he said, “I made a lot of enemies.” I think work is really important, but I also show how addiction to work has consequences and that addiction to anything always have to do with numbing other pain. For me, work is also a feminist statement. I feel like we still live in a world where a lot of women don’t work. I just got an email about grad night at my son’s school and 100% of the committee members were moms. For my mom, work was also a feminist act or statement. I think it’s connected to voice. A lot of my work is looking at voice, female voice, or lack of voice, and eating disorders. One of the most poignant points when I was making Thin, there was a woman who said she didn’t feel like she knew how to use her voice so she used her body instead and that when she saw her interview in my book she realized she had a voice. I think, for me, my work has been a voice, and that has been really empowering, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t consequences, too.




There’s this feeling now—most obviously when someone gets shamed online—that everyone must abide by this ideological purity. You can’t exert your ideals perfectly at every moment and still be a member of society.

LG : For me, the key is men. Most men in careers travel and focus on their work and compartmentalize and can still be great dads because of this unsung hero at home. In my case, my husband has been really supportive of my work and not letting my being a mother or a wife get in the way of helping me do it all. And it’s not just my husband. It’s also my mom. It just takes a lot of other people along the way. Even just the kind of introspection I went through in this film. In terms of the consequences, I don’t think you would see a man do that. It’s just normal life. Hopefully that part can start to become a little more balanced.

Speaking of context, out of anyone who could of spoken about the ideas in your work, why did you choose Chris Hedges? He’s the only person in the film who isn’t one of your previous photographic subjects.

LG : I actually did interview a lot of economists and experts, but in the end I felt that the film wanted to be more personal and character-driven. They all ended up on the cutting-room floor, except Chris Hedges, whose work was so inspiring to me and so tied into ideas I was trying to bring together but in a voice so different from my own. When I read his book Empire of Illusion, it just really brought together a lot of the ideas I was thinking about with pornography and money and where American society was going and capitalism. I really loved what he said about culture and authentic culture getting destroyed by capitalism, but also authentic culture being the thing that gives us the capacity to criticize ourselves. For me, that really spoke to what I was trying to do: make critical work that allows us to deconstruct the culture that we’re in and see the matrix that is affecting us every day.

At the beginning of the ’90s, there was this idea of being at the end of history, in this postmodern moment when we were going to surpass racism and sexism—even though everyone had a reminder in November 2016 that we’re not even close. In the film, it’s intimated that when our society falls, we’re going to take the world with it. Do you really feel like that’s true, or is there a way in which things can turn around?

 LG : In Generation Wealth, we’re stuck with a lot of stuff we inherit but we also have a lot of agency and the possibility for change. Using the analogy of addiction, this idea of hitting rock-bottom, the economic crisis, can also lead to insight and can also be moments that create possibilities for change. We would not have #MeToo without Harvey Weinstein, and maybe it takes Trump to really see ourselves. I included the line from Trump’s campaign when he said, “This isn’t about me. This is about you.” We elected him and we need to look at what that means about us and our culture. I think the values of corporate capitalism are a part of that. I think social media and the Internet are a part of that. I think this individualism and us living in silos is a part of that, and I think there’s this intense loneliness. This lack of connection and losing sight of what really matters is a part of it. I do have a lot of hope because of the characters and their insights. But that hope is on one side and on the other side is that feeling that we’ve been on this course for a long time; if unchanged, I think that will take us to a terrible place.

SXSW Interview: Lauren Greenfield. By Violet Lucca. Film Comment,  March 15, 2018. 





Follow the Money (Then Take a Picture). By   Kurt Soller. New York Times , August   2018.

A profile of Lauren Greenfield   

To call any of Ms. Greenfield’s portrayals flattering would be inaccurate. (Ms. Siegel’s husband sued the director for defamation after the “The Queen of Versailles” was released, but the director won $750,000 in legal fees after an arbitrator ruled that everything in the film was true.) And she seems to have a knack for convincing people to be radically, unappealingly honest. Her subjects must find that cathartic. Many have agreed to sit with her repeatedly over the years, including for “Generation Wealth,” and Ms. Greenfield has stayed close with several of them, even those she’s captured in harsh light.

One of them, a Las Vegas party host named Tiffany Masters, flew to New York to attend the “Generation Wealth” premiere. Sipping an espresso martini at the after-party, she described how Ms. Greenfield has caught her in various unfavorable ways: in the act of pulling her skirt down, for example, or recording a fatty “flap over the bra.” Nonetheless, Ms. Masters said, she doesn’t fault the artist. “Lauren has the ability to shoot the truth,” she said.

But does Ms. Masters like those photos of herself?

Long pause. “No.”

Why not?

Another long pause. “They’re unfiltered,” Ms. Masters said. “They’re raw. They’re uncensored. But they’re human.”

--------------

Both Mr. Evers and Ms. Greenfield were initially reluctant to include her story in the film. “But Lauren realized that she herself was very much a part of this wealth culture,” Mr. Evers said. “She wanted audiences to realize they were complicit, too.” Ms. Greenfield became more comfortable with appearing in her own work after trying it in a 2014 ad she created for the feminine-care brand Always. The spot featured the director interviewing children about gender stereotypes, showing how the phrase “like a girl” — as in “run like a girl” or “fight like a girl” — transforms into an insult as kids age. The campaign has become Ms. Greenfield’s most-watched product, after airing during the 2015 Super Bowl and amassing more than 200 million views.

“Generation Wealth,” which Ms. Greenfield has also turned into a traveling museum exhibition, doubles as a retrospective and a farewell to her focus on still photography. “Print is dying,” she said, and magazines are commissioning fewer shoots, unable to finance the weeks of travel that her style of reportage requires. In the future, she said, she will concentrate on documentaries. Her next project is with Showtime; Ms. Greenfield would reveal only that it is set in Asia.

Her current film ends with a dose of unexpected brightness, returning to characters who have forsaken their love of money for actual, human love. But ultimately, the takeaway from Ms. Greenfield’s decades of work seems to be that it’s up to future generations to decide how to spend their money — and if you ask her son Noah for his take, the kids are not all right.

“That’s what I realized from the film,” he said in an interview. “People are spending like nobody cares, and that’s exactly how it was in 2008.”





The exhibition is currently at the Fotomuseum Den Haag .

No comments:

Post a Comment