Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

29/05/2025

Ithell Colquhoun, Painter, Occultist, Poet and Author

 


 Radical, esoteric, and defiantly independent, Ithell Colquhoun (1906–1988) remains one of the most enigmatic figures in British surrealism. A painter, poet, and occultist, her practice dissolved the boundaries between gender, sexuality, and spiritual inquiry, positioning her as a visionary far ahead of her time. Having debuted at Tate St Ives in February 2025, Ithell Colquhoun: Between Worlds comes to Tate Britain from June and promises to be the largest exhibition of her work ever staged, featuring over 170 works, including rare archival material and pieces never before displayed publicly.

Below, in the lead-up to this major exhibition coming to Tate Britain, we delve into the life and work of Colquhoun to explore some of the facets of her legacy that make her such an intriguing figure.

 Rewriting the myth: Queer Feminism in Colquhoun’s Surrealism

 In 1927, Colquhoun enrolled at the Slade School of Fine Art, where she developed her distinctive approach to symbolism and composition. She was awarded joint first prize in the Summer Composition Competition for “Judith Showing the Head of Holofernes”, an early highlight in the exhibition’s curatorial journey. Reimagining the biblical tale of Judith – the widow who seduces and beheads the Assyrian general Holofernes to protect her people – Colquhoun renders feminist vengeance through a surrealist lens. 

 


 Dreamlike fragmentation liberates Judith from the constraints of passive femininity, transforming her into an archetype of mystical, embodied power. As in many of Colquhoun’s early works, the female figures are imbued with a striking masculinity – more muscular and heroic than their male counterparts, their bold, fleshy limbs and austere stances confronting the viewer with authority rather than subservience. Her reworkings of myth often centre the sacred androgynous body, eroticism between women, and archetypes that resist binary structures – offering an ecstatic, visionary model of queer embodiment that feels startlingly contemporary.

 Esoteric Foundations : Occult Influences and the Surrealist Rift

From an early age, Colquhoun was drawn to the esoteric. In 1928, she joined the Quest Society, founded by George Robert Stow Mead, former secretary to Helena Blavatsky of the Theosophical Society. The Society aimed to synthesise religion, philosophy, and science through esoteric traditions, and it laid the foundations for Colquhoun’s lifelong spiritual inquiries.

She later affiliated herself with other occultist groups such as the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO), drawing deeply from ceremonial magic, alchemy, and mystical symbolism. During her time at the Académie Colarossi in Paris, she was also exposed to the work of Salvador Dalí and other surrealists, expanding her interest in automatism and psychoanalytic theories of the unconscious. Colquhoun frequently corresponded with surrealist André Breton and remained deeply engaged with surrealist thought, even as her own practice increasingly veered toward mystical and feminist territory beyond the movement’s patriarchal centre.

Though aligned with British surrealism until 1940, Colquhoun eventually broke away from the movement, finding its increasingly orthodox politics incompatible with her pluralistic worldview. Her estrangement marked a decisive shift away from British modernism and toward a mystical, deeply personal exploration of inner and outer landscapes. “Symbolic scenes of ‘mind pictures’ may be dredged up from the depths of fantasy life,” she wrote, viewing her artistic practice not only as a creative technique but as a mode of divination – capable of accessing realms beyond temporal or bodily experience.

 


 Mysticism of the Land: Cornwall and the Sacred Feminine

In 1958, amid a growing sense of estrangement from the artistic mainstream, Ithell Colquhoun relocated to the remote village of Paul in West Penwith, Cornwall – a landscape she had long regarded as sacred. Steeped in myth and mysticism, the region’s ancient wells, megalithic stones, druidic relics, and carved crosses became more than just motifs in her work; they formed the living architecture of her spiritual imagination. Here, she devoted herself to painting, writing, and esoteric study, weaving together Celtic history, poetic vision, and occult philosophy. For Colquhoun, the Cornish landscape functioned as both psychic terrain and spiritual archive – a liminal space where her artistic, mystical, and intellectual pursuits could converge.

For Colquhoun, myth was not merely inherited – it was alive, continually generated by the unconscious in dialogue with land and archetype. She often invoked sacred geography in her art. Works such as Dance of the Nine Maidens (1940) and Dance of the Nine Opals (1942) depict local rock formations as sentient, mythic figures. The Cornish stones are anthropomorphised, dancing, dreaming, almost breathing – inviting the viewer into a dreamtime where history, magic, and geology converge. Her sketch of Dance of the Nine Opals reveals a meticulous sensitivity to the energetic webs that pulse beneath the surface – currents invisible to the untrained eye yet charged with historical, folkloric, and mystical significance. 

 

The Alchemical Body : Eroticism, Energy an the Feminine

Throughout her career, Colquhoun sought to map the hidden correspondences between plants, planets, body parts, and sacred geometry. Her work is charged with symbolic energy – merging anatomical forms with botanical structures, sexual imagery with cosmic diagrams.

 

 In “Attributes of the Moon” (1947) Colquhoun conjures the landscape not as passive but as generative, and feminine, expressing a vision of the feminine as protean and plural – a living system of symbols in continual metamorphosis. In “The Anatomy” (1942), a yonic work that evokes the enfolding architecture of caves, Colquhoun draws on the elemental symbolism of the earth as womb – simultaneously a site of concealment, transformation, and power. The image recalls the myth of Daphne, metamorphosed into a laurel tree by her father, a river god, to escape the sexual pursuit of Apollo. “The Anatomy” not only asserts the generative force of the feminine, but also reframes retreat and metamorphosis as acts of self-preservation and agency.

Archives of Magic : Colquhoun’s Library of the Occult

A pivotal starting point for the 2025 exhibition was Tate’s acquisition of Colquhoun’s personal archive from the National Trust in 2019. Comprising over 5,000 items, including sketches, writings, and unpublished diagrams, the collection reveals the extent of her devotion to the mystical arts.

 

 

 Her personal library – now housed in the Tate Archives – includes over 300 volumes on Greek mythology, alchemy, surrealism, Kabbalah, and ceremonial magic. Among them are The Golden Dawn (1937), The Kabbalah Unveiled (1887), Liber 777 by Aleister Crowley (1909), Dreams and Dream Stories by Anna Kingsford (1888), and Witchcraft Today by Gerald Gardner (1954). Together, they trace a lineage of esoteric thought through which Colquhoun developed her own queer, visionary cosmology.

A Radical Legacy

Colquhoun’s work dissolves conventional frameworks of gender, art, science, and spirit. She crafted a language in which imagination was not fantasy but a form of knowledge; where women could be both warriors and mystics; where eroticism was a divine force; and where the land itself was alive with memory and myth.

In our current cultural moment – one increasingly attuned to questions of fluid identity, ecological consciousness, and spiritual resurgence – Colquhoun’s legacy feels not only relevant but radical.

 Ithell Colquhoun: A queer, occultist artist who created between worlds. By Isabella Greenwood. Dazed, May 27, 2025.

 

 

 Tate 

  

 


Excellent long read.

Ithell Colquhoun: Mantic Stains, Sex & Surrealism by Andy Wilson. The Traveller in the Evening, March 7, 2025.

 

 



On a hillside not far from Land’s End, at the boundary of four parishes, stands the Mên Scryfa: perhaps Britain’s most resilient standing stone.

It is a slab of granite about six feet tall, likely first erected in the Bronze Age, and now set in the middle of a field (where it has served as a scratching post for itchy cows). Draw closer and you see a faint Latin inscription on its surface: “Rialobranus, son of Cunovalus”. The writing is a later addition from the 5th-6th century AD: two figures unknown, likely of noble blood. Run your fingers across the wonky lettering — feel the grooves in the granite, rough-textured as an oyster shell — and you almost sense an uncertainty in the scribe, recording the names in this novel Roman script.

By the 18th century Mên Scryfa had fallen down. It was re-erected in 1825, toppled again by treasure hunters in 1862 and put right again soon after. In June 2023, vandals set the stone ablaze with petrol and dug a ditch in a bid to topple it a third time (without success). On my visit last month, the lichen lost to the fire had started to return. The scorch marks were gone.

The Cornish hedgerows were thin on my visit to Mên Scryfa, the winter air sharp and clear, and so there were sightlines to other prehistoric monuments nearby: ancient barrows, quoits — and megaliths on the horizon that you had to fix your gaze upon a while to be sure they were not figures watching the Atlantic sunset, but cold sightless stones present there for thousands of years.

Here you understand a truth likely evident to Rialobranus, Cunovalus or their scribe. That Cornish granite is a stubborn material: hard to displace and prone to remembering the names of those etched into its grain after they have passed. Perhaps father and son expected a record of their dynasty would perish in parchment, but might endure for eternity if carved into a Bronze Age standing stone.

Penwith (meaning “the headland at the end”) marks the southwestern tip of the British mainland: a hook-shaped peninsula buttressed against the Atlantic by its steep granite cliffs. It counts as one of Europe’s densest prehistoric landscapes: filled with relics from the Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age past. In antiquity this area was a centre for mining: gold and tin were exported through prehistoric seaways. Cornish tin is found in the Nebra sky disc: an Early Bronze Age artefact, discovered in Germany in 1999, that is perhaps humanity’s oldest depiction of the night sky.

For much of winter the peninsula is besieged by gales. For much of summer it is braced against a headwind of mass tourism from the opposite direction. Crowds rush down the A30 to visit the tourist attraction at Land’s End: to watch 4D films, enjoy the Wallace and Gromit experience and take a selfie with the famous sign. For charity cyclists, Penwith flashes by in a flood of endorphins as they begin the long ride north to John O’Groats in Scotland.

I had visited on a beach holiday in August, but exploring its prehistoric sites in midwinter I was in another country. Holiday cottages were untenanted and unlit. Little drifts of storm-blown sand lay unshovelled by front doors. In one, a model boat placed in the window had cobwebs for rigging.

The roads were silent too. Rather than hunting for expensive beachfront parking, my quarry was potholed lay-bys on country lanes. Rather than scrumming through bank holiday crowds, I knocked on farmhouse doors, looking for someone, anyone to direct me to an obscure megalith I had spied on an OS map. Mostly I was alone with the stones — without company but for starling murmurations roused from the hedgerows when a five-bar gate clanged shut behind me.

There was another reason I was here. Tate St Ives has just opened the first major exhibition of Ithell Colquhoun — a painter and writer, much of whose creative output was inspired by Penwith’s ancient landscapes. Born in the hills of Assam in 1906, Colquhoun was a colourful figure. She had studied at the Slade, saw Dali lecture in London and was photographed by Man Ray holding a sheaf of wheat in Paris. She was ostracised by other figures in British surrealism because of her involvement in the occult, but hers was the life of a spiritual seeker.

 


 

Countless artists had come to St Ives for its famous light: many sought pastoral visions in Penwith’s fishing villages. Colquhoun came here to paint something beyond the visible: currents of mysterious energy she perceived flowing between ancient sites, cryptic stone circles whose meaning she sought to decode. In her 1957 book The Living Stones, she wrote of “stones that whisper, stones that dance, that play on pipe or fiddle, that tremble at cockcrow, that eat and drink, stones that march as an army — these unhewn slabs of granite hold the secret of the country’s inner life.” This new exhibition was seen by some as being a risky move for Tate: even 36 years after her death there was concern her art might seem too “woo-woo” for Anglo-Saxon sensibilities. But then, strike out beyond the gallery, drive west down the narrowing lanes of Penwith, and you soon remember this is no Anglo-Saxon land.

To cross the River Tamar into Cornwall is to cross a boundary whose subtleties maps don’t represent. In the minds of Penwith locals, a second threshold — the River Hayle — separates their own peninsula from the rest of the county. Penwith was reputedly home to the last native speakers of the Cornish language, and is where Cornwall’s granite backbone breaks out from beneath sedimentary rocks to reach the surface. Here — like Iona, Bardsey, Finistère — there is the sense that Celtic blood runs thickest where the last land succumbs to the sea.

Ithell Colquhoun understood this distinction when she came here in the 1940s. Boarding a Penzance-bound train at Paddington, she was escaping a bombed-out capital, a failed marriage and an unfulfilled love with a woman she had met in a hotel in Mykonos. In Penwith she immediately sensed a change: a “tingling magnetism” and “a balsamic quality of the air that never fails to bring healing”. She had found her cure.

She rented a corrugated iron studio in Lamorna, on Penwith’s southern coast. Where much of the peninsula is moorland dotted with hawthorn and blackthorn, the valley at Lamorna is jungly and — even on my winter visit — faintly tropical. There were bamboo groves and palm fronds rustling in the breeze. Colquhoun wrote of the Penzance dragon trees and other exotic species sustained by the Gulf Stream. Her studio had neither electricity nor a loo but she set to work: painting to the morning song of turtle doves in the valley. Lying in bed after dark, she felt the wings of bats from the attic touching her forehead. To her mind the peninsula was an enchanted land: both Atlantis and Avalon, its “Druidic” temples and Celtic saints manifestations of a deeper power in the granite bedrock. Where others considered it peripheral or at the end of the world, Colquhoun envisaged it a sacred centre of the planet.

Today her former studio — Vow Cave — is a private holiday home. Skylights have been fitted where the bats roosted. The retreat evoked in The Living Stones seems distant, but the prehistoric sites she painted nearby are unchanged. One afternoon I set out to explore some of them in the company of Matthew Shaw and Lally MacBeth, a couple who are the founders of Stone Club, a Cornwall-based organisation celebrating prehistoric landmarks. They first bonded over a shared love of Colquhoun’s work.

We stopped at the Merry Maidens: a late Neolithic to early Bronze Age stone circle that Colquhoun portrayed in Dance of the Nine Opals (1942). We drove down the single-track lane depicted in “Landscape with Antiquities (Lamorna)” (1950). We stopped for lunch at The Kings Arms in Paul — the village where Colquhoun later lived, before passing away in a nearby nursing home in 1988. A group of pagans were sitting at the next table, whispering plans for an evening ritual at a nearby site. “So we do three clockwise perambulations . . . ” 

 


 Ritual practices also continue at Penwith’s strangest prehistoric landmark: Mên-an-Tol. The centrepiece of this roughly 3,000-year-old site is a stone with a hole, depicted in Colquhoun’s painting “Sunset Birth” (1942). Folklore tells that women who crawl through it naked will be healed of infertility — early drafts of Sunset Birth show a feminine figure levitating in the circle. “You occasionally see half-dressed people hiding in the bushes,” Lally told me. “Some Cornish women even talk about having their own ‘Mên-an-Tol baby’.”

 Ancient sites like Mên-an-Tol were launch pads for Colquhoun’s imagination: prompts for deep time dreams. Her paintings are testament to how objects of such unfathomable antiquity invite a perspective that transcends ordinary sight. But exploring the St Ives exhibition, you sense there is also something unspoken. At the time Colquhoun was working, ley lines and earth energies were a novel idea — they are now universally regarded as pseudoscience. Her interpretation of stone circles as abodes of the divine feminine was once a fashionable one — it is also without evidence.

The function and meaning of those prehistoric sites she painted is uncertain, dating as it does to an unrecorded past. The esoteric, tantric and classical allusions in her art and writing are visionary, but they are also only projections. In one sense Colquhoun was radical. In another, she belonged to a long-established tradition: an outsider in Cornwall, in love with a half-imaginary land. 

 


 

In the 1980s, encampments of new age travellers were often pitched up by the stone circles of Penwith. Now they are gone but at the centre of the peninsula I tracked down Palden Jenkins, a self-described “aged hippy”. He had lived in Glastonbury and been an activist in Palestine before moving in his sixties to take up residence in a caravan near the Penwith village of Sancreed, with its granite 15th-century church and even older holy well, where pilgrims still come to tie cloth offerings to the trees.

Jenkins runs Ancient Penwith (ancientpenwith.org), a project to map what he described as a “landscape temple”, the network of ancient sites relaying energy in the manner of a “circuit board”. He instinctively understood Colquhoun’s paintings: he too felt the difference when he stepped on to the granite west of Penzance. Palden had been given a terminal bone marrow cancer diagnosis in 2019. He had been a champion fell runner in his youth: now it entailed a similar effort to walk to the Bronze Age barrows on nearby farmland, to have a smoke, reflect and heal.

“Strictly speaking I shouldn’t be alive now,” he told me. “I can’t put that down solely to visiting ancient sites. But they do have an effect on me: like an energy bath. Healing doesn’t always mean getting better, but helping you deal with the situation you have. You have to make peace with your death.”

A stone jetty extends out into a Cornish cove at dusk Lamorna Cove at dusk I drove a final lap around the peninsula. I passed the Mên Scryfa, guarding the boundary of four parishes, and the green valley at Lamorna, of which Colquhoun had written: “here, to exist here was enough.” Lastly, a couple of miles inland from Sennen Cove, I climbed Chapel Carn Brea, Penwith’s most southwesterly hill and itself supposedly a point of convergence for energy lines.

It was a bright, blustery morning. The Isles of Scilly were visible across a shining sea. Even a sceptic could discern energy flows from the summit. Above were the crooked vapour trails of planes changing course as they entered UK airspace. Below, undersea cables relayed power and information across the ocean, out of sight. But most perceptible was the Gulf Stream wind, making landfall after crossing endless leagues of open ocean. And the action of the waves all along that granite peninsula — crashing on the first and last rocks of England. Which, of course, were not quite England at all.

Cornwall’s mystical far west — in the footsteps of Ithell Colquhoun. By Oliver Smith. Financial Times, February 12, 2025.





Lamorna is a small village on the Cornish coast, in the far southwest of Britain. The expansive skies and landscapes of the area have long been a draw for artists, most famously painters associated with the Newlyn school such as Laura Knight, Alfred Munnings and Lamorna Birch. Less well known are the ground-breaking queer artists who set down roots in the village: Marlow Moss, Gluck and Ithell Colquhoun. In this film, we tell their story, and the story of the Cornwall where they lived and loved: a place of international modernism, Celtic spiritualism and the queer avant-garde.

Queer Cornwall: Marlow Moss, Gluck and Ithell Colquhoun in Lamorna. Tate, October 29, 2021.

 

 


  Ithell Colquhoun’s reputation as a Surrealist artist, writer and occultist has been surging in recent years. Most know her through her quirky travelogues of Ireland and Cornwall Crying of the Wind: Ireland(1955) and The Living Stones: Cornwall (1957), her Surrealist occult novel Goose of Hermogenes (1961), or perhaps her idiosyncratic account of the history of the Golden Dawn, The Sword of Wisdom (1975). Her visual art has been less accessible until recently, but is becoming more widely known with recent, beautifully illustrated publications featuring her Taro (tarot) deck and her color study of the Sephiroth of the Tree of Life, The Decad of Intelligence. Her genius is evident, yet so much about this brilliant and eccentric figure remains elusive. As I eagerly await the publication of my own biography of Colquhoun, Genius of the Fern Loved Gully (coming soon from Strange Attractor Preess), I thought I might delight you all with a topic I don’t address in the book in any great depth: Colquhoun seemed to have a weird thing about exploring base bodily functions with some delight. We don’t see this in just a few isolated literary incidents, urination and defecation are deliberate themes, explored sometimes with a strange intimate aside, and sometimes in rather perplexing detail.

 


 Now, it should be noted that Colquhoun wasn’t ever one to shy away from bold and socially prohibited imagery, particularly when it came to sex and bodies. In the 1930s and early 1940s her paintings went from somewhat suggestive studies of plants to vulvic tree trunks and full-frontal male nudes. Her private erotic studies also spared no detail. In her writings, Colquhoun’s treatment of bodily functions was not limited to urination and defecation. Her vignettes and prose poems referred to excreta on a number of occasions, however elimination appears in rather distinctive contexts. In various short pieces, Colquhoun writes of menstruation, skin conditions, scabs, open sores, and some weird brown fluid that seeped out of her navel at some stage which fascinated her. It is clear that she wishes to confront her audience with images that are in many ways completely ordinary yet rarely acknowledged in polite company. These explicit depictions are even more radical coming from a woman writer, when women are, even to this day, generally expected to keep our bodily fluids well out of sight and out of mind. Part of Colquhoun’s approach may have been a Surrealist exercise. Surrealism was and is disruptive to its very core, seeking to unlock the unconscious and to display taboo, dismemberment and horror, often with a generally Freudian sensibility. Yet while Colquhoun’s work can occasionally be macabre, and certainly shocking, she generally does not focus on the overtly morbid (although there are some exceptions). While there is no doubt that some of her prose was meant to shock, the clinical way in which she writes of things that drip and ooze itself is oddly alienating.

Colquhoun’s writing style in general leans toward cold observation, and this is true of even her most Surrealist writings. Although she uses thick description with respect to color and setting and her imagery is consistently rich, even the most bizarre activities in Colquhoun’s writings, including, sex, magic, incest and cannibalism, are depicted quite dispassionately. Colquhoun’s unpublished autobiography Until Twelve, likely written in the 1940s, would have us believe that keen observation was a trait she admired in herself from a very young age. Although her writings about her childhood observations are clearly filtered through an adult lens, she didn’t flinch from honest, seemingly detached reporting of her youthful encounters with sex, menstruation and the pubescent development of young bodies. Her short prose poems from the 1940s and 1950s retain an icy, objective flavor, reading as field notes from an anthropological expedition even when describing edgy subjects such as the prostitutes she carefully observed in her short prose poem titled Sligo Street, 1939. However, her depictions of waste elimination, while also taboo, offer different challenges to the viewer, and perhaps also some opportunities.

Although Colquhoun’s depictions of bodily waste were often matter of fact, they were also ironically tinged with the wider grasping of the ultimate which marked her life’s work. Despite the somewhat clinical treatment, Colquhoun juxtaposes urination and defecation with moments of wonder and transcendence, placing the sacred and profane in proximity, forcing the reader to accept the holy nature of the physical body. In one short prose poem, “Alchemical Text” the physics of urination encourage a meditation upon gender equality and embodiment:

 

 

 He said, quoting a sage, that every girl had her roots in earth. I said, where does every boy have his roots? He answered “In the sphere where fireworks explode”. I understood by this the polarity of alchemical earth and air, but wondered if it were valid. For if this distinction was, as it must have been, based upon different methods of making water, then certainly a girl’s water goes directly downwards into the earth; but a boy’s also must eventually return there, and for all its rocket like soaring, is bound at last for earth. “[1]

Another short piece “Images of Joy”, likely written in the 1940s or possibly late 1930s is a short recollection, likely from her time in Greece in the early 1930s, where Colquhoun has an uncommonly aesthetic response to the fecal remains of a wandering peasant:

I was sitting on a rock between mountains and sea and the sun was blazing down on the aloes, and I thought I was alone. But presently I heard a step and a peasant came along who thought he was alone and let down his pants and had a good shit. It was done in a minute with complete simplicity; he pulled them up again, not wiping his arsehole with so much as a leaf, fastened his belt and walked away.

I went forward to look at what he had done; it was beautiful, three concentric rings of golden brown, decorated like a cake with olive stones and shreds of tomato peel. The topmost ring ended in a little point aiming at the sky. I think the whole lot must have come away clean without leaving a trace; perhaps the intestine had come out a little way like an animal’s to form a funnel, though maybe there was a small stain on his trousers all the same. “[2]

 In two of Colquhoun’s longer form writings she juxtaposes urination with sacred sites and landscape. In, The Blue Anoubis, her unpublished 1966 travelogue about Egypt, she describes hiking up her skirts to pee behind a pyramid.[3] In her slightly earlier Surrealist novel I Saw Water, about an order of parthenogenic nuns existing in a shadowy afterlife, Colquhoun much more irreverently counterpoints the body and the altar as sites of sacred activity. The central character of the story, a postulant at the nunnery, finds herself exploring the convent church, when, at one of the altars in a side chapel, she lifts the top off the altar to find it covering a cistern. Overtaken by the urge to urinate she relieves herself in it, wiping herself with letters she finds in her pockets. She only gives the incident the briefest thought when a priest arrives, appearing to not have noticed or cared. Is the implication one of sacrilege, as she uses the altar in a way clearly unintended, or was the altar actually covering up a toilet? The sacred and the profane blur, or perhaps they were always one and the same. [4]

 


 

It is likely that Colquhoun was working to prompt a spiritual shift in the reader by elevating the debased and by making no one thing greater than any other. A key may lie in comment she makes in another short essay “Hexentanz”, which details sticky bodily fluids and the taste of ear wax: “Life is not beautiful but it is rich: All must be accepted.” [5] A lifelong animist with an interest in Tantra, Colquhoun wished to confront generally accepted standards of sacrality by uplifting and acknowledging that which is most degraded. While still quite young, at the age of 24, she delivered a paper to the Search Society, a group of occult writers and thinkers led by her distant cousin Edward Garstin, titled “The Connection Between Mysticism and Blasphemy”. Here she challenges standard conventions of blasphemy by arguing that the blasphemous creates the conditions for divine encounters:

Thus, though the blasphemer may be said to lower the divine, while the mystic raises himself to meet his Lord, yet in fact both perform the same process, that of bringing the divine and the human into contact. Since any vehicle cannot be unworthy of divinity, the doctrine of the Incarnate God and the whole train of sacramental teaching that follows in its wake is in this sense blasphemous...”[6]

By collapsing the categories of the sacred and the blasphemous one can reach an experience where nothing can be destroyed. She states “Where there is nothing, there is God.” “And if all can be destroyed, why, let there be destruction.” During the late 1920s and early 1930s Colquhoun also encountered Hindu Tantra, a tradition with which she felt some affinity due to her birth in the north of India, through the writings of John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon) and those of her cousin Edward Garstin. It seems quite possible that as she developed as a writer and artist that she extended her ideas about blasphemy into breaking taboos as a way of experiencing enlightenment and non-attachment as part of a Tantrically inspired esoteric framework.

 

Were Colquhoun’s literary scatological episodes a Surrealist exercise in shattering taboos? Simple juxtaposition of opposing images? Tantrically inspired sacramental meditations? Regardless of intent, she was likely considering some aspect of spiritual refinement, hoping to bring her audience along with her, changing our perspectives and cultivating a new way of seeing. Can’t exactly say that this tendency endeared her to publishers, but I don’t think she ever believed that her work was for the masses anyway.

Notes

Images © Samaritans, Noise Abatement Society and Spire Healthcare.

1. “Alchemical Text” in Shillitoe, Richard (ed). Medea’s Charms: Selected Shorter Writings of Ithell Colquhoun. (London: Peter Owen Publishers, 2019) p. 116.

2. “Images of Joy” ibid. pp. 132–133, and in the Tate Hyman Kreitman Archives at TGA 929/2/1/52/38.

3. Colquhoun, Ithell, The Blue Anoubis unpublished mss, c. 1967. Tate Hyman Kreitman Archives, TGA 929/2/1/6/8

4. Colquhoun, Ithell, (eds.) Richard Shillitoe and Mark Morrison, I Saw Water: An Occult Novel and Other Selected Writings (University Park, Penn State University Press, 2014). Kindle edition, location 1435.

5. “Hexentanz” exists in several versions. This quote was from the mss. TGA 929/2/1/52/56

5. Colquhoun, Ithell “The Connection Between Mysticism and Blasphemy” c. 1928/1929 unpublished mss. Tate Hyman Kreitman Archives, TGA 929/2/3/2

 

Ithell Colquhoun’s Peculiar Scatological Proclivities. By Amy Hale. Medium, May 4, 2020
 
 
 
 

 
 Writer and researcher Dr. Richard Shillitoe discusses the life and work of British artist, writer and occultist Ithell Colquhoun. As the talk sets out to show, she took her inspiration from the spiritual world as much as she did from the natural world, making extensive use of automatic drawing and painting methods as well as the contents of her dreams.

Ithell Colquhoun (1906-1988) is one of the 20th century’s most significant British surrealist artists. The daughter of a senior civil servant in India, she studied at the Slade School of Fine Art (1927-31) and had an award-winning painting exhibited in 1931 at the Royal Academy. She travelled widely in Mediterranean countries and lived in London before spending the greater part of her adult life in Cornwall where she painted, wrote and pursued extensive occult research. In 1940 she was ejected from the London Surrealist Group for refusing to compromise her occult interests. Her paintings have appeared in solo exhibitions as well as being shown in major art galleries. A significant body of Colquhoun’s artworks and archives were acquired by Tate in 2019, gifted by the National Trust. Her fame as a writer is largely based on a hermetic novel, Goose of Hermogenes, and two highly personal travelogues The Crying of the Wind: Ireland and The Living Stones: Cornwall. She also published Sword of Wisdom, the authoritative biography of MacGregor Mathers, the founder of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. She died in Cornwall in 1988.

Dr Richard Shillitoe is an independent researcher. His book Ithell Colquhoun: Magician Born of Nature (2010) includes an extensive catalogue of Colquhoun’s artwork. He co-edited the first publication of Colquhoun’s novel I Saw Water (2014) and edited the illustrated edition of her first novel Goose of Hermogenes (2018). He has recently published Medea’s Charms (2019), a volume of Colquhoun’s poems, essays and short stories. He maintains the website www.ithellcolquhoun.co.uk

  
Magician Born of Nature: the Life and Work of Ithell Colquhoun. Drawing Room, October 13, 2020

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

20/04/2025

Extremist Narratives For Young Women

 

 


 

Netflix’s Adolescence has kickstarted much-needed conversations on the radicalisation of young men – but many young women are being taken in by extremist narratives too.

 Netflix’s Adolescence has taken the world by storm, offering a searing portrayal of a now-familiar narrative: a young boy radicalised online by misogynistic content who ultimately commits violence against a girl in his class for rejecting him. But while Adolescence explores how boys can become radicalised online, many girls of the same age have been consuming similarly harmful content. 

When I was 13, the same age as the show’s protagonist Jamie, the social media website Tumblr was at the height of its popularity, with over 100 million blog posts coming out every four months. Sandwiched between GIFs of Gerard Way and fanfiction, I learnt what feminism was, became familiar with queer culture, and discovered the power of protest. But anyone familiar with the internet in the 2010s knows Tumblr was also flooded with graphic depictions of self-harmpro-ana blogs, and so much porn. I have often joked that anyone online at that time should receive a state-funded I survived Tumblr in 2014 t-shirt. While none of this content was explicitly framed as misogyny, it contributed to normalising violence against female bodies.

We know how online misogynistic content radicalises young men: it teaches them to hate women and then they translate that hatred into real-world violence. Thankfully, Adolescence has made the UK government finally take notice of what is happening behind the closed doors of boys’ bedrooms. But what’s missing from the ongoing discourse is how young girls also absorb misogynistic content, and how seemingly innocuous private online experiences ultimately shape their public attitudes, behaviours, and desires.

Dr Catherine Tebaldi is an anthropologist and researcher. “Men do [commit] more violent acts, but women serve a really important role. By combining beauty and a perceived sexual availability with right-wing rhetoric, they are expert propagandists,” she says. “They can normalise the message as soft, feminine, caring for the (white) family.” This maternal and homesteading image of femininity has re-emerged recently in the resurgence of the “tradwife” – the ultra-feminine, homemaking woman who romanticises the submission and domesticity of 1950s Americana. But hidden beneath the kitschy aesthetic are the same patriarchal gender roles being repackaged and circulated by young women themselves. Many tradwife influencers explicitly endorse and encourage anti-feminist and white nationalist views under the guise of a rustic ‘barefoot and pregnant’ way of life. This radicalisation is quiet, aestheticised – and deeply effective.

Dr Tracy Llanera, an Associate Professor of Philosophy researching women in the far-right, tells me that this vein of female radicalisation is so difficult to challenge as it is often framed using a bioessentialist language which makes virtues out of care, motherhood, femininity, and Christian duty. As a result, many of the women involved in far-right misogyny and radicalisation don’t see their actions as violent. Unlike their male counterparts, whose radicalisation is often driven by rage or aggression, Llanera explains: “They can argue ‘but I’m not hurting anyone, my choice will not involve violence’”.

But ideology can be violent too. “There is a disconnect between the prospects of violence that one comes to expect in other extremist movements – where women come to expect physical violence – and the experiences of women joining the far-right,” Llanera continues. But women have long had active roles in the violence of far-right radicalisation. From the KKK’s women’s auxiliary, to the pro-life movement, and the rise of TERF ideology, women have played a central role in sustaining politics that result in violence. Case in point: Trump’s 2024 election, where white women voted for him in near-equal numbers to white men. Yet mainstream discussions of violent far-right radicalisation still focus overwhelmingly on men, failing to recognise the women who work to uphold these structures.

The radicalisation of women extends into their private, personal lives too. The online choke-me-daddy ‘sex positivity’ of the last decade, while attempting to encourage bodily autonomy, has arguably been incredibly harmful for young women, normalising violence during sex and conditioning both men and women to see it as desirable. Billie Eilish recently opened up about the impact early exposure to internet porn had on her sexuality: “I was watching abusive porn, to be honest, when I was like 14… It got to the point where I couldn’t watch anything else. Unless it was violent, I didn’t think it was attractive.” While it’s worth caveating that some women do enjoy rough sex, there are also countless young women like Eilish who have been socialised to accept sexual violence without considering whether it’s something they innately desire.

Female radicalisation is happening at an alarming rate, and we need to talk about it in conjunction with how we talk about the radicalisation of boys. But the solution to this crisis is not to curb women’s autonomy – either on or offline. “There’s always been this effort to prevent women from being in online spaces,” journalist Taylor Lorenz tells me. While boys are being radicalised every day, there has never been a call to get them off the internet; meanwhile, Lorenz says, people like Jonathan Haidt infantilise young women, suggesting they – not boys – should be kept offline because they’re “too neurotic” and vulnerable to handle harmful algorithms, arguing they are a danger to themselves. “The internet is liberating for women [...] it’s a crucial lifeline for them,” Lorenz continues. “Young girls see a much wider variety of body types and feminist thought on the internet today than they ever could in the past, and that’s what really scares people.”

Because while the internet may be a conduit to radicalisation, it isn’t the root cause. “We live under a patriarchy,” Lorenz argues. “Women are growing up in this hyper-capitalist hellscape and our entire society is set up for them to fail [...] If more of their offline lives were equal, then they wouldn’t be buying into these [misogynistic] fantasies.” This is true regardless of gender – in order to stop young people being radicalised, we need to break the systems which radicalise them. We need to build a world where our material conditions don’t turn us towards oppressive alternatives, where submission isn’t sold as survival – a world that gives feminism something real to hope for.

 
We need to talk about female radicalisation. By Esme Hood. Dazed, April 14, 2025.

 

 


 

Controversial dating advice which promotes traditional gender roles is all over the internet — but why is this dated advice so popular?

Content creator Maria Bergmann first heard the term “sprinkle sprinkle” three years ago. The term originates from YouTuber Leticia Padua (known as Shera Seven), who uses it as a catchphrase and a way to say “blessings” while dishing out relationship tips online. This advice plays into traditional gender roles and is often highly controversial – telling women to reverse “anything that comes out of a man’s mouth,” laugh if a date suggests splitting the bill, use men for money alone (never emotional support), and to cheat on anyone who is “broke”. Still, to Shera’s millions of followers, her outlook perfectly captures young heterosexual women’s increasing frustration with dating today. For Bergmann, “sprinkle sprinkle” completely shifted her approach to dating. “I started watching Shera’s videos once a week and six months later I found my boyfriend,” she says.

Bergmann spoke to me over the phone from her vacation at the Four Seasons in Thailand. “We travel a lot,” she says. “And I just moved to Norway for him so he put my name on the house.” As it turns out, this is all part of the “sprinkle sprinkle” method. Now three years into the relationship, she says she set the tone early, thanks to Shera’s advice. Around their two-month anniversary, Bergmann asked her boyfriend to pay the deposit for her new apartment. “Shera says that if a man is really interested in you, he’s going to show you that he loves you financially,” she says. “So I told him it was $2,500 and he just sent it to my bank account.” Bergmann still watches Shera’s videos weekly, treating them like a dating bible. “My goal now is to get married,” she says. And, of course, Shera’s YouTube is there to help guide her to that destination.

Across social media, people like Bergmann post their aspirational lifestyle as proof that the “sprinkle sprinkle” method works while single women share resources for finding and dating rich men, including becoming a cart attendant at a golf club or visiting specific bars in New York. While the phrase “marrying up” could easily remind you of the complex social mobility dynamics of Bridgerton, the age-old practice of hypergamy still has a solid place in the modern dating scene. To luxury matchmaker and dating coach May Kalinu, “sprinkle sprinkle” has grown to represent women setting a boundary with what’s expected when dating men. “As women achieve higher levels of education and career success, they want partners who can match their level of financial ambition and emotional labour of providing for the family,” she says. “Women want men to pay for dinner – it’s the least they could do given the hurdles.”

Like Shera, Kalinu provides relationship advice for women who want to be spoiled by their male partners. She started creating videos in 2020, after getting laid off from her corporate job and receiving support from her partner. Today, her audience of over 280,000 mostly consists of 25 to 35 year old women. “These women are unapologetically prioritising their wants and needs, leading to a greater emphasis on relationships that offer both emotional fulfilment and financial security,” she says. And it’s easy to see why some women are collectively saying enough is enough (with the 4B movement encouraging the refusal of heterosexual marriage entirely). Over the past 50 years, the share of women who earn as much or more than their husbands has tripled, but even wives who outearn their spouses are still doing hours more care and housework, while their husbands enjoy more leisure time. Then there’s the gender pay gap, where the inequality is even greater for Black and Hispanic women.

Searching for the “sprinkle sprinkle” experience could be seen as giving the middle finger to the pressure for women to “do it all”, but that doesn’t mean Shera’s advice isn’t rife with gendered expectations. She has strong feelings about how women should dress for men and tells her followers to use their “feminine voice”. Josie Glass, a 26-year-old entrepreneur in Fort Lauderdale, is just one of the many women implementing this advice into their everyday lives. Since discovering Shera’s videos a year ago, Glass says she’s been dressing and speaking differently – talking “more professionally” and putting more pride into her appearance. “I have been attracting what I consider to be high-value men,” she says. “Sprinkle sprinkle will ultimately benefit dating culture because men are stepping up their game and striving to be a provider while women hold themselves to higher standards.” Unfortunately, this traditionally feminine physical advice and phrases like “high value” or “provider” also overlap with the misogynistic dating advice spewed out by the likes of Andrew Tate.

For 26-year-old content L.K.P, following the “sprinkle sprinkle” guidelines has been lonely. “There’s a need to be cutthroat and unwavering in your standards to truly embody the approach,” she says. “It does weed out the men you thought you were interested in, but choosing yourself above everything else is a surprisingly difficult lifestyle to maintain.” She tried dressing up and going to an affluent restaurant by herself (per Shera’s advice) but felt “icky” about the intention of actively trying to get men to notice her, so she didn’t even leave her car. Now, she’s deleted all dating apps, stopped attending singles events, and feels strongly that she’ll meet someone once it’s time. Still, she considers “sprinkle sprinkle” to be the final straw for many women and, to her personally, a hopeful call from a fairy godmother. “It's like waking up from the cognitive belief that dating has to be hard, that you have to settle, and that what you want isn’t attainable,” she says. “Saying ‘sprinkle sprinkle’ is like saying ‘walk towards the light.’”

Sprinkle sprinkle: why hypergamy is trending on TikTok. By Laura Pitcher. Dazed, July 17, 2024.


 

 


 

From Nara Smith to Gwen The Milkmaid, tradwives make up some of the biggest influencers on social media – but why are we so invested in their lives?

 It’s a strange chapter in late capitalism when one of the most successful influencers on social media is a Mormon tradwife who posts videos of herself making Oreos from scratch. With over 2.2 million followers on TikTok, Nara Smith, an IMG model currently living in Los Angeles with her husband – the model Lucky Blue Smith – and two young children, began surfacing on the For You Page in V1 of this year, known for her viral content that sees her make elaborate home-cooked meals in silk feathered bathrobes, narrating each video with soothing vocal fry. “I wanna be like her when I grow up,” says one user. “I aspire to be like you,” writes another with a crying face emoji.

Smith is part of a growing trend of TikTok #tradwives and #SAHG (stay-at-home girlfriends) performing domestic labour for the feed, preaching the ‘good life’ with aspirational clips of high-end skincare routines and sourdough starters. Another is Gwen the Milkmaid, who recently traded an online presence as an OnlyFans creator in exchange for tradwife TikTok, where she posts domestic clips of herself baking bread in floral tea dresses. “Once upon a time, I was a man-hating feminist,” she says, in one video that sees her carefully crafting lasagna sheets with the help of a brand new Kitchenaid. “Now I’m happily spending hours in the kitchen making my husband whatever he wants for dinner.”

On the surface, these women claim to retreat from capitalism into a slower life away from the grind. Back when women didn’t have careers but rather stayed at home to rear a family. “But the home and the family and the body of the woman herself has never really been a place to escape from capitalism,” says Rachel O’Dwyer, a lecturer in Digital Cultures at Dublin’s NCAD who spoke on the topic at this year’s transmediale festival in Berlin. “It was always ground zero, the place where the good feelings for the good life and capitalism were shored up and set afloat.” Anyone who’s shared content onto TikTok will know that filming and editing videos takes work, and tradwives are no exception. “These girls are doing a job; they’re the latest form of content creators. This work is its own hustle and produces its own income,” agrees O’Dwyer. 

Tradwives have admittedly been around for some time now – I recall the first wave of internet tradwives in 2022 brought on by the likes of reactionary podcasts like Red Scare and alt-right pundits. While the content itself follows the same blueprint (sharing content about what a great housewife you are), what’s different is the socio-political atmosphere surrounding them: conservatism is growing among young men, hate speech and extremist content is rampant across X (formerly known as Twitter), and censorship is on the rise. Last month, Meta announced that it’s no longer recommending posts about political and social issues, though this has less of an impact on conservative creators since their content is less explicitly politically charged (compared to, say, topics such as abortion and gun control). As influencers who make content about homemaking, tradwives do not appear explicitly political, but the conservative subtext cannot be ignored.

As with other (questionable) girl online archetypes such as the E-girl military waifu, this makes the internet tradwife a deceptive aesthetic. She appears domestic and submissive, polishing her already spotless marble countertop under the soft glow of a Diptyque candle, yet never fully having to get dirty with actual domestic labour, such as cleaning the toilet or pulling clumps of hair from the drain. She plays the role of a young, hot homemaker, positioning herself as a counter to the neoliberal girlboss, or worse, the angry millennial feminist with her purple hair and pronouns. While the former lives a life of excess – think liberal celebrities like Beyoncé and Taylor Swift flying on private jets – the tradwife adheres to a pious set of principles, like dressing modestly, mothering hoards of children, quoting Bible verses. The libs hate the tradwife because she stands for everything they despise (AKA the reversal of feminist values), yet condemning the tradwife will inevitably give ammunition to the sort of online puritans who believe liberals have ruined society along with sex scenes and gentle parenting. In short, the same 4chan bros looking to ‘dignify’ your thirst traps using AI probably love Mormon TikTokers sharing GRWM clips on their way to Sunday service.

What makes a bunch of affluent women cosplay 1950s housewives for the feed is a tricky case to unpack. Almost all of these neo-tradwives come from money – Smith married rich and Hannah Neeleman of Ballerina Farm, another Mormon influencer, is heir to a billion-dollar fortune. As one commentator pointed out in a viral response video, “They’re not better than us because they can make their children’s cereal from scratch, they’re better than us because they are so wealthy that they have nothing more important to worry about.” Also, do I need remind you that #tradwife content pulls in digits (if the millions of page views are any indication), which is particularly useful for any aspiring businesswoman wanting to launch her personal brand.

Instead of looking at why there’s an uptick in tradwife content, perhaps we should ask ourselves why it’s so popular, even among left-leaning users who don’t necessarily believe in its values. Sure, there’s plenty of trad parodies on the feed with millions of views, but there’s clearly something about these women and their lives that keeps us coming back for more – whether that’s as an escape from the harsh demands of late capitalism, or plain voyeurism, a blemish-free peek through the curtain to the lives of the wealthy. As the viewer, there’s an obvious allure to this lobotomised vision of domesticity for the same reason that we obsess over the interior lives of the rich and famous. We know it’s unrealistic but it’s also a soothing way to tap out of our own less-than-satisfactory lives for the same reason you might tune into an ASMR video or watch an ambient show on Netflix. “I understand that I am being sold a lie but I don’t want to think. I want to vibe. I want a date night. I want to get ready with her. I want an expensive candle,” says O’Dwyer.

Ironically, the unquenching appetite for this sort of online content is getting bigger as women’s reproductive rights in the US are being stripped back in real-time – Alabama has just ruled frozen embryos are children, while in other states birth control is becoming harder to access. Clearly, the system is broken, yet we continue to hold onto the promises of capitalism against all evidence, instead funnelling our apathy into tradwife cosplay, and the illusion that our lives might be better if we resign ourselves to the care of a strong male provider.

Beyond tradwives, however, the internet is amok with capitalist fantasies, whether it’s the self-help guru instructing you on ‘how to create your dream reality’, or TikTok subliminals  promising wealth and prosperity through hot girl clips and ‘444’ angel numbers. “What’s new today maybe is the hyper-commodification of this content,“ suggests O’Dwyer. From bimbos to E-girls and Pinkydoll, girls online are embracing the smooth-brained agenda, which doesn’t seem too far detached from the tradwife’s own lobotomised credentials. But perhaps we should be asking ourselves why we feel the need to relinquish our thoughts in the first place.

 

Tradwives are levelling up. By Günseli Yalcinkaya. Dazed, March 12,2024.