Showing posts with label painter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label painter. Show all posts

29/05/2025

Ithell Colquhoun, Painter, Occultist, Poet and Author

 


 Radical, esoteric, and defiantly independent, Ithell Colquhoun (1906–1988) remains one of the most enigmatic figures in British surrealism. A painter, poet, and occultist, her practice dissolved the boundaries between gender, sexuality, and spiritual inquiry, positioning her as a visionary far ahead of her time. Having debuted at Tate St Ives in February 2025, Ithell Colquhoun: Between Worlds comes to Tate Britain from June and promises to be the largest exhibition of her work ever staged, featuring over 170 works, including rare archival material and pieces never before displayed publicly.

Below, in the lead-up to this major exhibition coming to Tate Britain, we delve into the life and work of Colquhoun to explore some of the facets of her legacy that make her such an intriguing figure.

 Rewriting the myth: Queer Feminism in Colquhoun’s Surrealism

 In 1927, Colquhoun enrolled at the Slade School of Fine Art, where she developed her distinctive approach to symbolism and composition. She was awarded joint first prize in the Summer Composition Competition for “Judith Showing the Head of Holofernes”, an early highlight in the exhibition’s curatorial journey. Reimagining the biblical tale of Judith – the widow who seduces and beheads the Assyrian general Holofernes to protect her people – Colquhoun renders feminist vengeance through a surrealist lens. 

 


 Dreamlike fragmentation liberates Judith from the constraints of passive femininity, transforming her into an archetype of mystical, embodied power. As in many of Colquhoun’s early works, the female figures are imbued with a striking masculinity – more muscular and heroic than their male counterparts, their bold, fleshy limbs and austere stances confronting the viewer with authority rather than subservience. Her reworkings of myth often centre the sacred androgynous body, eroticism between women, and archetypes that resist binary structures – offering an ecstatic, visionary model of queer embodiment that feels startlingly contemporary.

 Esoteric Foundations : Occult Influences and the Surrealist Rift

From an early age, Colquhoun was drawn to the esoteric. In 1928, she joined the Quest Society, founded by George Robert Stow Mead, former secretary to Helena Blavatsky of the Theosophical Society. The Society aimed to synthesise religion, philosophy, and science through esoteric traditions, and it laid the foundations for Colquhoun’s lifelong spiritual inquiries.

She later affiliated herself with other occultist groups such as the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO), drawing deeply from ceremonial magic, alchemy, and mystical symbolism. During her time at the Académie Colarossi in Paris, she was also exposed to the work of Salvador Dalí and other surrealists, expanding her interest in automatism and psychoanalytic theories of the unconscious. Colquhoun frequently corresponded with surrealist André Breton and remained deeply engaged with surrealist thought, even as her own practice increasingly veered toward mystical and feminist territory beyond the movement’s patriarchal centre.

Though aligned with British surrealism until 1940, Colquhoun eventually broke away from the movement, finding its increasingly orthodox politics incompatible with her pluralistic worldview. Her estrangement marked a decisive shift away from British modernism and toward a mystical, deeply personal exploration of inner and outer landscapes. “Symbolic scenes of ‘mind pictures’ may be dredged up from the depths of fantasy life,” she wrote, viewing her artistic practice not only as a creative technique but as a mode of divination – capable of accessing realms beyond temporal or bodily experience.

 


 Mysticism of the Land: Cornwall and the Sacred Feminine

In 1958, amid a growing sense of estrangement from the artistic mainstream, Ithell Colquhoun relocated to the remote village of Paul in West Penwith, Cornwall – a landscape she had long regarded as sacred. Steeped in myth and mysticism, the region’s ancient wells, megalithic stones, druidic relics, and carved crosses became more than just motifs in her work; they formed the living architecture of her spiritual imagination. Here, she devoted herself to painting, writing, and esoteric study, weaving together Celtic history, poetic vision, and occult philosophy. For Colquhoun, the Cornish landscape functioned as both psychic terrain and spiritual archive – a liminal space where her artistic, mystical, and intellectual pursuits could converge.

For Colquhoun, myth was not merely inherited – it was alive, continually generated by the unconscious in dialogue with land and archetype. She often invoked sacred geography in her art. Works such as Dance of the Nine Maidens (1940) and Dance of the Nine Opals (1942) depict local rock formations as sentient, mythic figures. The Cornish stones are anthropomorphised, dancing, dreaming, almost breathing – inviting the viewer into a dreamtime where history, magic, and geology converge. Her sketch of Dance of the Nine Opals reveals a meticulous sensitivity to the energetic webs that pulse beneath the surface – currents invisible to the untrained eye yet charged with historical, folkloric, and mystical significance. 

 

The Alchemical Body : Eroticism, Energy an the Feminine

Throughout her career, Colquhoun sought to map the hidden correspondences between plants, planets, body parts, and sacred geometry. Her work is charged with symbolic energy – merging anatomical forms with botanical structures, sexual imagery with cosmic diagrams.

 

 In “Attributes of the Moon” (1947) Colquhoun conjures the landscape not as passive but as generative, and feminine, expressing a vision of the feminine as protean and plural – a living system of symbols in continual metamorphosis. In “The Anatomy” (1942), a yonic work that evokes the enfolding architecture of caves, Colquhoun draws on the elemental symbolism of the earth as womb – simultaneously a site of concealment, transformation, and power. The image recalls the myth of Daphne, metamorphosed into a laurel tree by her father, a river god, to escape the sexual pursuit of Apollo. “The Anatomy” not only asserts the generative force of the feminine, but also reframes retreat and metamorphosis as acts of self-preservation and agency.

Archives of Magic : Colquhoun’s Library of the Occult

A pivotal starting point for the 2025 exhibition was Tate’s acquisition of Colquhoun’s personal archive from the National Trust in 2019. Comprising over 5,000 items, including sketches, writings, and unpublished diagrams, the collection reveals the extent of her devotion to the mystical arts.

 

 

 Her personal library – now housed in the Tate Archives – includes over 300 volumes on Greek mythology, alchemy, surrealism, Kabbalah, and ceremonial magic. Among them are The Golden Dawn (1937), The Kabbalah Unveiled (1887), Liber 777 by Aleister Crowley (1909), Dreams and Dream Stories by Anna Kingsford (1888), and Witchcraft Today by Gerald Gardner (1954). Together, they trace a lineage of esoteric thought through which Colquhoun developed her own queer, visionary cosmology.

A Radical Legacy

Colquhoun’s work dissolves conventional frameworks of gender, art, science, and spirit. She crafted a language in which imagination was not fantasy but a form of knowledge; where women could be both warriors and mystics; where eroticism was a divine force; and where the land itself was alive with memory and myth.

In our current cultural moment – one increasingly attuned to questions of fluid identity, ecological consciousness, and spiritual resurgence – Colquhoun’s legacy feels not only relevant but radical.

 Ithell Colquhoun: A queer, occultist artist who created between worlds. By Isabella Greenwood. Dazed, May 27, 2025.

 

 

 Tate 

  

 


Excellent long read.

Ithell Colquhoun: Mantic Stains, Sex & Surrealism by Andy Wilson. The Traveller in the Evening, March 7, 2025.

 

 



On a hillside not far from Land’s End, at the boundary of four parishes, stands the Mên Scryfa: perhaps Britain’s most resilient standing stone.

It is a slab of granite about six feet tall, likely first erected in the Bronze Age, and now set in the middle of a field (where it has served as a scratching post for itchy cows). Draw closer and you see a faint Latin inscription on its surface: “Rialobranus, son of Cunovalus”. The writing is a later addition from the 5th-6th century AD: two figures unknown, likely of noble blood. Run your fingers across the wonky lettering — feel the grooves in the granite, rough-textured as an oyster shell — and you almost sense an uncertainty in the scribe, recording the names in this novel Roman script.

By the 18th century Mên Scryfa had fallen down. It was re-erected in 1825, toppled again by treasure hunters in 1862 and put right again soon after. In June 2023, vandals set the stone ablaze with petrol and dug a ditch in a bid to topple it a third time (without success). On my visit last month, the lichen lost to the fire had started to return. The scorch marks were gone.

The Cornish hedgerows were thin on my visit to Mên Scryfa, the winter air sharp and clear, and so there were sightlines to other prehistoric monuments nearby: ancient barrows, quoits — and megaliths on the horizon that you had to fix your gaze upon a while to be sure they were not figures watching the Atlantic sunset, but cold sightless stones present there for thousands of years.

Here you understand a truth likely evident to Rialobranus, Cunovalus or their scribe. That Cornish granite is a stubborn material: hard to displace and prone to remembering the names of those etched into its grain after they have passed. Perhaps father and son expected a record of their dynasty would perish in parchment, but might endure for eternity if carved into a Bronze Age standing stone.

Penwith (meaning “the headland at the end”) marks the southwestern tip of the British mainland: a hook-shaped peninsula buttressed against the Atlantic by its steep granite cliffs. It counts as one of Europe’s densest prehistoric landscapes: filled with relics from the Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age past. In antiquity this area was a centre for mining: gold and tin were exported through prehistoric seaways. Cornish tin is found in the Nebra sky disc: an Early Bronze Age artefact, discovered in Germany in 1999, that is perhaps humanity’s oldest depiction of the night sky.

For much of winter the peninsula is besieged by gales. For much of summer it is braced against a headwind of mass tourism from the opposite direction. Crowds rush down the A30 to visit the tourist attraction at Land’s End: to watch 4D films, enjoy the Wallace and Gromit experience and take a selfie with the famous sign. For charity cyclists, Penwith flashes by in a flood of endorphins as they begin the long ride north to John O’Groats in Scotland.

I had visited on a beach holiday in August, but exploring its prehistoric sites in midwinter I was in another country. Holiday cottages were untenanted and unlit. Little drifts of storm-blown sand lay unshovelled by front doors. In one, a model boat placed in the window had cobwebs for rigging.

The roads were silent too. Rather than hunting for expensive beachfront parking, my quarry was potholed lay-bys on country lanes. Rather than scrumming through bank holiday crowds, I knocked on farmhouse doors, looking for someone, anyone to direct me to an obscure megalith I had spied on an OS map. Mostly I was alone with the stones — without company but for starling murmurations roused from the hedgerows when a five-bar gate clanged shut behind me.

There was another reason I was here. Tate St Ives has just opened the first major exhibition of Ithell Colquhoun — a painter and writer, much of whose creative output was inspired by Penwith’s ancient landscapes. Born in the hills of Assam in 1906, Colquhoun was a colourful figure. She had studied at the Slade, saw Dali lecture in London and was photographed by Man Ray holding a sheaf of wheat in Paris. She was ostracised by other figures in British surrealism because of her involvement in the occult, but hers was the life of a spiritual seeker.

 


 

Countless artists had come to St Ives for its famous light: many sought pastoral visions in Penwith’s fishing villages. Colquhoun came here to paint something beyond the visible: currents of mysterious energy she perceived flowing between ancient sites, cryptic stone circles whose meaning she sought to decode. In her 1957 book The Living Stones, she wrote of “stones that whisper, stones that dance, that play on pipe or fiddle, that tremble at cockcrow, that eat and drink, stones that march as an army — these unhewn slabs of granite hold the secret of the country’s inner life.” This new exhibition was seen by some as being a risky move for Tate: even 36 years after her death there was concern her art might seem too “woo-woo” for Anglo-Saxon sensibilities. But then, strike out beyond the gallery, drive west down the narrowing lanes of Penwith, and you soon remember this is no Anglo-Saxon land.

To cross the River Tamar into Cornwall is to cross a boundary whose subtleties maps don’t represent. In the minds of Penwith locals, a second threshold — the River Hayle — separates their own peninsula from the rest of the county. Penwith was reputedly home to the last native speakers of the Cornish language, and is where Cornwall’s granite backbone breaks out from beneath sedimentary rocks to reach the surface. Here — like Iona, Bardsey, Finistère — there is the sense that Celtic blood runs thickest where the last land succumbs to the sea.

Ithell Colquhoun understood this distinction when she came here in the 1940s. Boarding a Penzance-bound train at Paddington, she was escaping a bombed-out capital, a failed marriage and an unfulfilled love with a woman she had met in a hotel in Mykonos. In Penwith she immediately sensed a change: a “tingling magnetism” and “a balsamic quality of the air that never fails to bring healing”. She had found her cure.

She rented a corrugated iron studio in Lamorna, on Penwith’s southern coast. Where much of the peninsula is moorland dotted with hawthorn and blackthorn, the valley at Lamorna is jungly and — even on my winter visit — faintly tropical. There were bamboo groves and palm fronds rustling in the breeze. Colquhoun wrote of the Penzance dragon trees and other exotic species sustained by the Gulf Stream. Her studio had neither electricity nor a loo but she set to work: painting to the morning song of turtle doves in the valley. Lying in bed after dark, she felt the wings of bats from the attic touching her forehead. To her mind the peninsula was an enchanted land: both Atlantis and Avalon, its “Druidic” temples and Celtic saints manifestations of a deeper power in the granite bedrock. Where others considered it peripheral or at the end of the world, Colquhoun envisaged it a sacred centre of the planet.

Today her former studio — Vow Cave — is a private holiday home. Skylights have been fitted where the bats roosted. The retreat evoked in The Living Stones seems distant, but the prehistoric sites she painted nearby are unchanged. One afternoon I set out to explore some of them in the company of Matthew Shaw and Lally MacBeth, a couple who are the founders of Stone Club, a Cornwall-based organisation celebrating prehistoric landmarks. They first bonded over a shared love of Colquhoun’s work.

We stopped at the Merry Maidens: a late Neolithic to early Bronze Age stone circle that Colquhoun portrayed in Dance of the Nine Opals (1942). We drove down the single-track lane depicted in “Landscape with Antiquities (Lamorna)” (1950). We stopped for lunch at The Kings Arms in Paul — the village where Colquhoun later lived, before passing away in a nearby nursing home in 1988. A group of pagans were sitting at the next table, whispering plans for an evening ritual at a nearby site. “So we do three clockwise perambulations . . . ” 

 


 Ritual practices also continue at Penwith’s strangest prehistoric landmark: Mên-an-Tol. The centrepiece of this roughly 3,000-year-old site is a stone with a hole, depicted in Colquhoun’s painting “Sunset Birth” (1942). Folklore tells that women who crawl through it naked will be healed of infertility — early drafts of Sunset Birth show a feminine figure levitating in the circle. “You occasionally see half-dressed people hiding in the bushes,” Lally told me. “Some Cornish women even talk about having their own ‘Mên-an-Tol baby’.”

 Ancient sites like Mên-an-Tol were launch pads for Colquhoun’s imagination: prompts for deep time dreams. Her paintings are testament to how objects of such unfathomable antiquity invite a perspective that transcends ordinary sight. But exploring the St Ives exhibition, you sense there is also something unspoken. At the time Colquhoun was working, ley lines and earth energies were a novel idea — they are now universally regarded as pseudoscience. Her interpretation of stone circles as abodes of the divine feminine was once a fashionable one — it is also without evidence.

The function and meaning of those prehistoric sites she painted is uncertain, dating as it does to an unrecorded past. The esoteric, tantric and classical allusions in her art and writing are visionary, but they are also only projections. In one sense Colquhoun was radical. In another, she belonged to a long-established tradition: an outsider in Cornwall, in love with a half-imaginary land. 

 


 

In the 1980s, encampments of new age travellers were often pitched up by the stone circles of Penwith. Now they are gone but at the centre of the peninsula I tracked down Palden Jenkins, a self-described “aged hippy”. He had lived in Glastonbury and been an activist in Palestine before moving in his sixties to take up residence in a caravan near the Penwith village of Sancreed, with its granite 15th-century church and even older holy well, where pilgrims still come to tie cloth offerings to the trees.

Jenkins runs Ancient Penwith (ancientpenwith.org), a project to map what he described as a “landscape temple”, the network of ancient sites relaying energy in the manner of a “circuit board”. He instinctively understood Colquhoun’s paintings: he too felt the difference when he stepped on to the granite west of Penzance. Palden had been given a terminal bone marrow cancer diagnosis in 2019. He had been a champion fell runner in his youth: now it entailed a similar effort to walk to the Bronze Age barrows on nearby farmland, to have a smoke, reflect and heal.

“Strictly speaking I shouldn’t be alive now,” he told me. “I can’t put that down solely to visiting ancient sites. But they do have an effect on me: like an energy bath. Healing doesn’t always mean getting better, but helping you deal with the situation you have. You have to make peace with your death.”

A stone jetty extends out into a Cornish cove at dusk Lamorna Cove at dusk I drove a final lap around the peninsula. I passed the Mên Scryfa, guarding the boundary of four parishes, and the green valley at Lamorna, of which Colquhoun had written: “here, to exist here was enough.” Lastly, a couple of miles inland from Sennen Cove, I climbed Chapel Carn Brea, Penwith’s most southwesterly hill and itself supposedly a point of convergence for energy lines.

It was a bright, blustery morning. The Isles of Scilly were visible across a shining sea. Even a sceptic could discern energy flows from the summit. Above were the crooked vapour trails of planes changing course as they entered UK airspace. Below, undersea cables relayed power and information across the ocean, out of sight. But most perceptible was the Gulf Stream wind, making landfall after crossing endless leagues of open ocean. And the action of the waves all along that granite peninsula — crashing on the first and last rocks of England. Which, of course, were not quite England at all.

Cornwall’s mystical far west — in the footsteps of Ithell Colquhoun. By Oliver Smith. Financial Times, February 12, 2025.





Lamorna is a small village on the Cornish coast, in the far southwest of Britain. The expansive skies and landscapes of the area have long been a draw for artists, most famously painters associated with the Newlyn school such as Laura Knight, Alfred Munnings and Lamorna Birch. Less well known are the ground-breaking queer artists who set down roots in the village: Marlow Moss, Gluck and Ithell Colquhoun. In this film, we tell their story, and the story of the Cornwall where they lived and loved: a place of international modernism, Celtic spiritualism and the queer avant-garde.

Queer Cornwall: Marlow Moss, Gluck and Ithell Colquhoun in Lamorna. Tate, October 29, 2021.

 

 


  Ithell Colquhoun’s reputation as a Surrealist artist, writer and occultist has been surging in recent years. Most know her through her quirky travelogues of Ireland and Cornwall Crying of the Wind: Ireland(1955) and The Living Stones: Cornwall (1957), her Surrealist occult novel Goose of Hermogenes (1961), or perhaps her idiosyncratic account of the history of the Golden Dawn, The Sword of Wisdom (1975). Her visual art has been less accessible until recently, but is becoming more widely known with recent, beautifully illustrated publications featuring her Taro (tarot) deck and her color study of the Sephiroth of the Tree of Life, The Decad of Intelligence. Her genius is evident, yet so much about this brilliant and eccentric figure remains elusive. As I eagerly await the publication of my own biography of Colquhoun, Genius of the Fern Loved Gully (coming soon from Strange Attractor Preess), I thought I might delight you all with a topic I don’t address in the book in any great depth: Colquhoun seemed to have a weird thing about exploring base bodily functions with some delight. We don’t see this in just a few isolated literary incidents, urination and defecation are deliberate themes, explored sometimes with a strange intimate aside, and sometimes in rather perplexing detail.

 


 Now, it should be noted that Colquhoun wasn’t ever one to shy away from bold and socially prohibited imagery, particularly when it came to sex and bodies. In the 1930s and early 1940s her paintings went from somewhat suggestive studies of plants to vulvic tree trunks and full-frontal male nudes. Her private erotic studies also spared no detail. In her writings, Colquhoun’s treatment of bodily functions was not limited to urination and defecation. Her vignettes and prose poems referred to excreta on a number of occasions, however elimination appears in rather distinctive contexts. In various short pieces, Colquhoun writes of menstruation, skin conditions, scabs, open sores, and some weird brown fluid that seeped out of her navel at some stage which fascinated her. It is clear that she wishes to confront her audience with images that are in many ways completely ordinary yet rarely acknowledged in polite company. These explicit depictions are even more radical coming from a woman writer, when women are, even to this day, generally expected to keep our bodily fluids well out of sight and out of mind. Part of Colquhoun’s approach may have been a Surrealist exercise. Surrealism was and is disruptive to its very core, seeking to unlock the unconscious and to display taboo, dismemberment and horror, often with a generally Freudian sensibility. Yet while Colquhoun’s work can occasionally be macabre, and certainly shocking, she generally does not focus on the overtly morbid (although there are some exceptions). While there is no doubt that some of her prose was meant to shock, the clinical way in which she writes of things that drip and ooze itself is oddly alienating.

Colquhoun’s writing style in general leans toward cold observation, and this is true of even her most Surrealist writings. Although she uses thick description with respect to color and setting and her imagery is consistently rich, even the most bizarre activities in Colquhoun’s writings, including, sex, magic, incest and cannibalism, are depicted quite dispassionately. Colquhoun’s unpublished autobiography Until Twelve, likely written in the 1940s, would have us believe that keen observation was a trait she admired in herself from a very young age. Although her writings about her childhood observations are clearly filtered through an adult lens, she didn’t flinch from honest, seemingly detached reporting of her youthful encounters with sex, menstruation and the pubescent development of young bodies. Her short prose poems from the 1940s and 1950s retain an icy, objective flavor, reading as field notes from an anthropological expedition even when describing edgy subjects such as the prostitutes she carefully observed in her short prose poem titled Sligo Street, 1939. However, her depictions of waste elimination, while also taboo, offer different challenges to the viewer, and perhaps also some opportunities.

Although Colquhoun’s depictions of bodily waste were often matter of fact, they were also ironically tinged with the wider grasping of the ultimate which marked her life’s work. Despite the somewhat clinical treatment, Colquhoun juxtaposes urination and defecation with moments of wonder and transcendence, placing the sacred and profane in proximity, forcing the reader to accept the holy nature of the physical body. In one short prose poem, “Alchemical Text” the physics of urination encourage a meditation upon gender equality and embodiment:

 

 

 He said, quoting a sage, that every girl had her roots in earth. I said, where does every boy have his roots? He answered “In the sphere where fireworks explode”. I understood by this the polarity of alchemical earth and air, but wondered if it were valid. For if this distinction was, as it must have been, based upon different methods of making water, then certainly a girl’s water goes directly downwards into the earth; but a boy’s also must eventually return there, and for all its rocket like soaring, is bound at last for earth. “[1]

Another short piece “Images of Joy”, likely written in the 1940s or possibly late 1930s is a short recollection, likely from her time in Greece in the early 1930s, where Colquhoun has an uncommonly aesthetic response to the fecal remains of a wandering peasant:

I was sitting on a rock between mountains and sea and the sun was blazing down on the aloes, and I thought I was alone. But presently I heard a step and a peasant came along who thought he was alone and let down his pants and had a good shit. It was done in a minute with complete simplicity; he pulled them up again, not wiping his arsehole with so much as a leaf, fastened his belt and walked away.

I went forward to look at what he had done; it was beautiful, three concentric rings of golden brown, decorated like a cake with olive stones and shreds of tomato peel. The topmost ring ended in a little point aiming at the sky. I think the whole lot must have come away clean without leaving a trace; perhaps the intestine had come out a little way like an animal’s to form a funnel, though maybe there was a small stain on his trousers all the same. “[2]

 In two of Colquhoun’s longer form writings she juxtaposes urination with sacred sites and landscape. In, The Blue Anoubis, her unpublished 1966 travelogue about Egypt, she describes hiking up her skirts to pee behind a pyramid.[3] In her slightly earlier Surrealist novel I Saw Water, about an order of parthenogenic nuns existing in a shadowy afterlife, Colquhoun much more irreverently counterpoints the body and the altar as sites of sacred activity. The central character of the story, a postulant at the nunnery, finds herself exploring the convent church, when, at one of the altars in a side chapel, she lifts the top off the altar to find it covering a cistern. Overtaken by the urge to urinate she relieves herself in it, wiping herself with letters she finds in her pockets. She only gives the incident the briefest thought when a priest arrives, appearing to not have noticed or cared. Is the implication one of sacrilege, as she uses the altar in a way clearly unintended, or was the altar actually covering up a toilet? The sacred and the profane blur, or perhaps they were always one and the same. [4]

 


 

It is likely that Colquhoun was working to prompt a spiritual shift in the reader by elevating the debased and by making no one thing greater than any other. A key may lie in comment she makes in another short essay “Hexentanz”, which details sticky bodily fluids and the taste of ear wax: “Life is not beautiful but it is rich: All must be accepted.” [5] A lifelong animist with an interest in Tantra, Colquhoun wished to confront generally accepted standards of sacrality by uplifting and acknowledging that which is most degraded. While still quite young, at the age of 24, she delivered a paper to the Search Society, a group of occult writers and thinkers led by her distant cousin Edward Garstin, titled “The Connection Between Mysticism and Blasphemy”. Here she challenges standard conventions of blasphemy by arguing that the blasphemous creates the conditions for divine encounters:

Thus, though the blasphemer may be said to lower the divine, while the mystic raises himself to meet his Lord, yet in fact both perform the same process, that of bringing the divine and the human into contact. Since any vehicle cannot be unworthy of divinity, the doctrine of the Incarnate God and the whole train of sacramental teaching that follows in its wake is in this sense blasphemous...”[6]

By collapsing the categories of the sacred and the blasphemous one can reach an experience where nothing can be destroyed. She states “Where there is nothing, there is God.” “And if all can be destroyed, why, let there be destruction.” During the late 1920s and early 1930s Colquhoun also encountered Hindu Tantra, a tradition with which she felt some affinity due to her birth in the north of India, through the writings of John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon) and those of her cousin Edward Garstin. It seems quite possible that as she developed as a writer and artist that she extended her ideas about blasphemy into breaking taboos as a way of experiencing enlightenment and non-attachment as part of a Tantrically inspired esoteric framework.

 

Were Colquhoun’s literary scatological episodes a Surrealist exercise in shattering taboos? Simple juxtaposition of opposing images? Tantrically inspired sacramental meditations? Regardless of intent, she was likely considering some aspect of spiritual refinement, hoping to bring her audience along with her, changing our perspectives and cultivating a new way of seeing. Can’t exactly say that this tendency endeared her to publishers, but I don’t think she ever believed that her work was for the masses anyway.

Notes

Images © Samaritans, Noise Abatement Society and Spire Healthcare.

1. “Alchemical Text” in Shillitoe, Richard (ed). Medea’s Charms: Selected Shorter Writings of Ithell Colquhoun. (London: Peter Owen Publishers, 2019) p. 116.

2. “Images of Joy” ibid. pp. 132–133, and in the Tate Hyman Kreitman Archives at TGA 929/2/1/52/38.

3. Colquhoun, Ithell, The Blue Anoubis unpublished mss, c. 1967. Tate Hyman Kreitman Archives, TGA 929/2/1/6/8

4. Colquhoun, Ithell, (eds.) Richard Shillitoe and Mark Morrison, I Saw Water: An Occult Novel and Other Selected Writings (University Park, Penn State University Press, 2014). Kindle edition, location 1435.

5. “Hexentanz” exists in several versions. This quote was from the mss. TGA 929/2/1/52/56

5. Colquhoun, Ithell “The Connection Between Mysticism and Blasphemy” c. 1928/1929 unpublished mss. Tate Hyman Kreitman Archives, TGA 929/2/3/2

 

Ithell Colquhoun’s Peculiar Scatological Proclivities. By Amy Hale. Medium, May 4, 2020
 
 
 
 

 
 Writer and researcher Dr. Richard Shillitoe discusses the life and work of British artist, writer and occultist Ithell Colquhoun. As the talk sets out to show, she took her inspiration from the spiritual world as much as she did from the natural world, making extensive use of automatic drawing and painting methods as well as the contents of her dreams.

Ithell Colquhoun (1906-1988) is one of the 20th century’s most significant British surrealist artists. The daughter of a senior civil servant in India, she studied at the Slade School of Fine Art (1927-31) and had an award-winning painting exhibited in 1931 at the Royal Academy. She travelled widely in Mediterranean countries and lived in London before spending the greater part of her adult life in Cornwall where she painted, wrote and pursued extensive occult research. In 1940 she was ejected from the London Surrealist Group for refusing to compromise her occult interests. Her paintings have appeared in solo exhibitions as well as being shown in major art galleries. A significant body of Colquhoun’s artworks and archives were acquired by Tate in 2019, gifted by the National Trust. Her fame as a writer is largely based on a hermetic novel, Goose of Hermogenes, and two highly personal travelogues The Crying of the Wind: Ireland and The Living Stones: Cornwall. She also published Sword of Wisdom, the authoritative biography of MacGregor Mathers, the founder of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. She died in Cornwall in 1988.

Dr Richard Shillitoe is an independent researcher. His book Ithell Colquhoun: Magician Born of Nature (2010) includes an extensive catalogue of Colquhoun’s artwork. He co-edited the first publication of Colquhoun’s novel I Saw Water (2014) and edited the illustrated edition of her first novel Goose of Hermogenes (2018). He has recently published Medea’s Charms (2019), a volume of Colquhoun’s poems, essays and short stories. He maintains the website www.ithellcolquhoun.co.uk

  
Magician Born of Nature: the Life and Work of Ithell Colquhoun. Drawing Room, October 13, 2020

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

07/03/2025

The Lost Novels of Elaine Kraf

 





As Elaine Kraf's The Princess of 72nd Street is added to the Penguin Modern Classics roster, Kat Lister re-examines the author's legacy and talks to Kraf's daughter about putting together the pieces of the life of one of the most neglected and most radical novelists of the 1970s

Around thirty pages into Elaine Kraf’s 1979 novella, The Princess of 72nd Street, we encounter our narrator, Ellen, riding up and down in her apartment elevator, embracing anyone who enters it: “sweet people, the mean ones, old, young, the pushers, heroin addicts, cocaine snorters, drunks, married men.” In Ellen’s eyes, this ordinary lift has been transformed into a magical box “with blue lights gleaming from its roof and walls of flaming orange.” It is, on this particular evening, a conduit to another world, another way of being. Until, that is, she wakes up the next morning with bruises and memory gaps and a cue card pinned to her fridge that reads: DON’T LET STRANGE MEN INTO YOUR APARTMENT. “I wonder, “ she ponders her handwriting, “what I really meant.”

And so begins Kraf’s prismatic take on female agency and mental health – now declared to be “a lost classic for fans of Renata Adler and Elizabeth Hardwick”. As the American author Melissa Broder asks in her introduction to Penguin Classics’ latest edition of The Princess of 72nd Street: “Who is entitled to hold power over the inner world of another? What defines sanity?” While we’re posing these kinds of questions: what defines liberation? For Ellen, a mentally unstable artist living alone (and possibly with bipolar disorder – although it’s never disclosed) in New York, the answers are never clear-cut as she battles to live life on her own terms in a world that seeks to diminish it.

 


 

At the centre of this tug-of-war are her “radiances”: kaleidoscopic bursts of manic energy that transform her neighbourhood on the Upper West Side into a joyful kingdom she resides over as Princess Esmeralda. During one of these synesthetic highs, she sees drifts of blue circles and large orange flowers; during another, hissing waves that run over her toes, the floor turning to white sand. In the midst of all this colour and glow, Ellen gleefully topless dances to the beat of her own drum. And her subjects on 72nd street, “the people who elected me,” are all nonconformists, too: “men standing on corners half asleep with drugs, the proprietors of small grocery stores, the Argentinian pianist who sells records.” For Esmeralda at the centre of all this, her radiances – at least, at the time she is experiencing them – are her strength. But for those around her – mostly a revolving cast of deranged and inadequate men who tumble in and out of her bed – they are her shame, something to repress and control.

That this feminist classic was written with such visionary abandon, and that its author should then disappear from view, never to publish again, only adds to the cult mystique surrounding Kraf 45 years later. How did the author of four novels – I Am Clarence (1969), The House of Madelaine (1971), Find Him! (1977) and The Princess of 72nd Street (1979) – end up with only a 250-word Wikipedia page, and three of these novels now out of print?

“Even as her daughter, I’m still putting together the pieces of the puzzle,” Kraf’s only child, Milena Kraf Altman, admits on a video call from her home in New York. “For the longest time I just thought of her as ‘mom’ and I never got to fully understand her as a writer.” But when Kraf died in 2013, at the age of 77, Altman discovered a storage unit crammed full of her poems, diaries and stories. She has since been reading them, little by little, to understand her mother’s life in the 1970s better, using those words to fill in the gaps she left behind.

Kraf, Altman tells me, was born in the Bronx, in 1936, the daughter of a New York senator. An academically bright child, by the age of sixteen she had already graduated from high school, and, against her parents wishes, chose to go to art college. The willfulness she displayed in her teenage years would soon find its way onto the writing page with her simultaneous fragile-yet-strong-willed female characters. In other words: women on the periphery of what is considered ‘normal’. What does it mean to be deemed mentally unstable in a world that too-often appears mentally unstable itself? It’s a theme she would return to again and again, beginning with her first novel, I Am Clarence, a story that, like The Princess of 72nd Street, would deconstruct the relationship between a mentally ill woman and the patriarchal forces that meddle and interfere with her. In the case of her debut, a deteriorating mother struggles to love and care for her disabled child against a backdrop of cruel jibes, crass doctors, and self-seeking lovers. “When a novelist tells a good story well, it becomes a good novel,” a New York Times reviewer wrote upon the publication of I Am Clarence in 1969. “When a novelist uses words as if they were a sacred love, what he writes becomes poetry.”

Or should we now amend: what she wrote became poetry. And yet despite a decade of bold and beautiful writing: “she had a lot of issues getting noticed,” Altman says. When she was, she could sometimes be misunderstood. “Elaine Kraf’s Find Him! had me confused at times as to the significance of its collage-like bits and pieces, but left no doubt as to her gifts as a stylist,” one reviewer wrote of her third novel in 1977. The mixed feedback frustrated her, Altman tells me. As did her struggles to get published. In a letter she has since found in her mother’s storage unit, Kraf writes that things would have been easier if she’d been a man. “A lot of women back then were being encouraged to put their names as men in order to get published,” Altman expands. Although her first two novels were put out by the corporate might of Doubleday, her last two would be supported by the smaller indies Fiction Collective and New Directions. But when Kraf’s agent passed away shortly after The Princess of 72nd Street was published, things became harder to navigate as an avant-garde writer, and despite her keenness to keep writing, she wouldn’t be published again.

“There was a pile of unpublished novels”, Altman recalls of her childhood home in the 90s. “Next to that, a pile of rejection letters.” What’s more: “The rejection letters were very harsh – and usually written by men.” Hearing about Kraf’s determination to live a creatively autonomous life within the confines of a rigidly patriarchal framework, I am reminded of the fictional women she so vividly brought to life, full of desire and self-awareness and will. “Who are they to pass judgement anyhow?” a doubtful Ellen asks as her seventh radiance wilts and dissipates in The Princess of 72nd Street. “Aren’t these my streets?” On the one hand we have Ellen: a narrator that Kraf once described as “very critical and conservative.” On the other hand, Esmeralda: “who is free and doesn’t care what anyone thinks about her.” And yet: “They are both a part of the same person, often at odds with each other.” It’s a Janus-like creation, the one woman nestled inside the other like Russian dolls – and an innovative one. Now Kraf is being republished, it’s almost like we’re finally catching up with her pioneering mind, a few steps behind.

“She was so driven,” Altman pays tribute to that mind. “Not just in her writing, but in everything she did.” Her painting, for instance, which led her out into the city where “she would find drawers on the street and that would be her canvas.” Then in the 1980s, she became a principal of a special-education school, and so began another chapter in her life. “She instilled this notion in me that you reinvent yourself every few years. You don’t have to be set in one thing that you do.” Although she would always be a painter to Altman: “The evolution of who she was was never set.” Which is what makes her reappraisal in 2025 all the more apt. This summer, Penguin Modern Classics will republish I Am Clarence for the next generation of readers. But perhaps the most thrilling news is that there are potentially more stories yet to come. Altman’s favourite of her mother’s novels is yet to be published, she tells me. “There’s a lot more powerful work that I would love for the world to see.”


As for the ones that are already out there, the feeling, for Altman, is a joyful one. “I’m ecstatic by it, to see other people digest her work in whatever way they interpret it, it’s the conversation she [Kraf] always hoped for.” What’s more, as the world lurches further to the far-right, Kraf’s third eye on female liberation makes her writing as vital as ever. The one woman nestled inside the other – with her eyes looking up at the sun. For as Ellen puts it, the sun is the only entity that understands her. “It roars its comprehension of everything I am.”

 

Blue Lights Gleaming & Walls of Flaming Orange: The Lost Novels of Elaine Kraf. By Kat Lister. The Quietus, January 18, 2025.

All images of Kraf's work courtesy Milena Kraf Altman 
 
 
 
 
 


According to my feed, the book of the summer is a tie between Miranda July’s sexy midlife-crisis drama, All Fours; the new Sally Rooney galley; and a slim experimental novel published in 1979. Elaine Kraf’s The Princess of 72nd Street lyrically details the seventh “radiance” experienced by a young figure painter named Ellen who, during fits of seeming psychosis, believes herself to be the sovereign ruler of West 72nd between Broadway and Central Park. Ellen/Princess Esmerelda makes witty observations about creativity, femininity, and public life with a voice that feels startlingly modern: Of Eastside men flirting with her kingdom’s subjects, she says, “We don’t like to be bullied by slick strangers in Gucci jeans.”

Kraf died in 2013, but her fourth and final book lives on — recommended on Twitter by critic Lauren Oyler, snapped on Stories by Substack darling Rayne Fisher-Quann. 45 years since it was first published and two years since writer Hannah Williams dubbed it "a true underappreciated classic" in the New Yorker, The Princess of 72nd Strret gets a reissue from Random House, out August 6. It includes an introduction by Melissa Broder, author of Death Valley, Milk Fed, and the iconic millennial-malaise essay collection So Sad Today, born of her Twitter account that catalogs such bangers as “am i an independent woman or just scared of everyone and isolated.” A veritable expert on writing from the perspective of the afflicted woman, Broder tells NYLON why The Princess of 72nd Street should be in the pantheon of mental-illness fiction.

When did you first read The Princess of 72nd Street?

I get asked about blurbing things four or five times a week and probably only blurb four to six books a year. I have this reflexive electric fence up because I need to do my own reading. If I blurb something, I have to love it, and I have to read the whole book. Less often am I asked to write an introduction. As soon as I started [The Princess of 72nd Street], I was like, “Yes, this is a text I want to grapple with.”

What details hooked you? I could not stop thinking about the woman who only wants to paint still-lifes of plums and her husband who has banished plums from their life.

I had never read a manic episode described so beautifully. The book is asking very interesting questions about personal freedom and self-governance, and the line between mental health and spirituality. But as a work of literature on an imagistic level, she’s describing these orange flowers growing from her body and joy cracking out of her every pore, or petal, or cell. There’s self-awareness, but at the same time, you can get lost in the beatific imagery of the experience. I also love the humor and the innate competition that’s going on between men and women, and the particular competition that can come within an artist’s relationship – which is what the plum thing is about.

It’s a story about artists not making art.

Romantic obsession is the same creative energy that we can channel into art. I think that love is an act of creation, too. But it’s very easy, if you have an active imagination, to treat other human beings as a blank canvas and project whatever we want to see onto them. Or to turn that inwards.

Do you experience obsession as a creative block?

When an artist isn’t obsessing about their work, we have a tendency to obsess about ourselves. This book came to me when I had just come out of a period of triple grief. My father had died, I lost an ex to suicide, and then a friend to suicide. I wasn’t really writing that much. I had canceled my Death Valley book tour. I was really obsessing about my own mental health and a lot of my creative energy was going toward trying to fix it. One thing that I identified with in the Princess is, while she is not trying to control her manic visions — she loves her manic visions and her internal experience — she is trying to establish a protocol for how she can live in this state without ending up in the hospital again. She has all kinds of rules for herself and those rules become progressively more elaborate. One might say that some of that obsessing over rules could be put towards her art.

“This woman is shapeshifting. She doesn’t have a stable concept of self – which, like, who does?”

The word “mania” doesn’t actually appear in the book. Do you think of the Princess as “bipolar” or diagnose her with some other modern medical term?

Let's put it this way: She does have manic episodes. And when they end, or if she’s given Thorazine, she does fall into a depression. So we can call that what we may. She describes mania as “full of radiance and flooded with a feeling of small bells ringing and showers of light.” Depression she describes as a pit. There’s a comedown, and the comedown is extremely painful. That is very true to life.

Why does it feel so rare and remarkable among our wellspring of contemporary writing on mental illness to feel like the Princess is a trustworthy narrator?

There are some readers who might say, “How can we trust her?” She’s having visions. She's describing herself as a ballerina, a saint, a mother, a mystic, an ethereal spirit, an Earth goddess. This woman is shapeshifting. She doesn’t have a stable concept of self – which, like, who does? Let’s be real about that fact. What is reliable is that the Princess is committed to telling the truth as she sees it. She’s not hiding anything. We are with her. We are on her side. We are in her head. Even if her view might not be “consensual reality,” her honesty is to be trusted as to her own experience.

Her honesty is what all her boyfriends find so jarring about her within the text. What do you think about the way that Kraf wrote men?

The men don’t come out very well. We’ve got Auriel, the illusionist who she’s madly in love with who then fakes his suicide. We’ve got Peter, the painter who has an emotional allergy to plums because he fears his girlfriend’s success. We’ve got her ex-husband, Adolphe, who is also an egomaniacal artist who has numerous breakdowns when his work involving traffic lights is declared unoriginal. She’s under the thumb of her ex-boyfriend George, who, when she was with him, prohibited laughter and singing and sent her to quite possibly the worst man of all in the book: the psychiatrist, Dr. Clufftrain, who’s totally batshit. He sees patients 21 hours a day and has no boundaries. He’s constantly shaking. He prescribes her weird medicines that make her sick. It’s the blind leading the blind when it comes to the medical profession in this book.

Then there’s the last man…

I wouldn’t say the end is flawed, and I wouldn’t declare it as problematic, because I don't know if there is such a thing as an objective view of art from a subjective place. But I wasn’t keen on the end. Subjectively, I was disappointed. But she has to come back down to Earth. There are sacrifices.

“Romantic obsession is the same creative energy that we can channel into art. Love is an act of creation, too.”

While trying to sell two more novels after The Princess of 72nd Street, unsuccessfully, Kraf wrote to an editor that she “never particularly liked The Princess of 72nd Street as literature.” She described the book as a “farewell to a part of my life composed of dreams and fantasies.” Can you relate to the renouncing of one’s past work?

Many writers — and not just writers, but songwriters and visual artists — look back at their work and have doubts about it. I think it’s a very natural part of the process, especially if you’re in a different place in your life than you were when you wrote it. Once the work is in the world, it can feel like it has taken on a life of its own. Sometimes I’ll read things that I’ve written and I’m like, “I don’t even know who wrote this.” I have no recollection. I guess it’s just the shedding of selves. Artists are the lucky ones who have a record of the layers of self.

What in the book do you think will be particularly resonant for the 23-year-olds reading it this summer?

Self-awareness, reflecting on one’s own interiority in a public way, seems to be something that women are more able to exercise now. With the internet, we’re always reflecting on our interiority in a public way. The romantic obsession in the book, too, that’s eternal, but the Princess has a freedom to take on many lovers that I think is contemporary. I wouldn't say she's polyamorous, but she’s not monogamous. People are interested in non-monogamy.

People are also interested in portrayals of a bygone New York.

I haven’t lived in New York in ten years. The first time I lived in New York was for a summer in 1998, then I was there from 2003 to 2013. But whenever I’m back, one of the areas that feels a little less Chase Bank-ified are parts of the Upper West Side. I mean, it’s all Chase Bank-ified, but around 110th to 116th, Broadway and Riverside, still feels like it has that resonance. There are still diners!

Is it fair to call The Princess of 72nd Street a “cult classic”?

“Cult classic” is a high compliment. Who needs to appeal to everybody? To have written a cult classic, that’s pretty f*cking cool.

Melissa Broder On The Oddball 1979 Novel Having A Summer Renaissance. By Greta Rainbow.  Nylon, August 6, 2024.



  



When Elaine Kraf died, in 2013, no major publication—or any minor ones, as far as I can tell—ran an obituary. This is perhaps unsurprising; although she had worked as a painter and as the principal of a special-education school, she was probably most notable as a novelist, and she hadn’t published a book in more than thirty years. The Times had called her first novel  "I Am Clarence",  an “extraordinary achievement,” but it was long since out of print, as were two books that had followed it. But her fourth and final book "The Princess of 72nd Street" remains in print; it was reissued by the Dalkey Archive Press in 2000, and has enough of a following to make it seem at least slightly strange that an online search for Kraf returns little more than a six-line Wikipedia page, a couple short bios on publisher Web sites, and a handful of listings for the remaining copies of her works.

I first went looking for information about Kraf after asking, on Twitter, for recommendations for a very specific sort of book. I wanted to read formally experimental novels that were written by women in the nineteen-seventies and eighties and that had what I thought of as a certain New York sensibility. I was picturing un-ashed cigarettes on empty stoops, halogen reflections in scummy puddles, hot asphalt under rushing feet. The novelist and critic Lauren Oyler suggested “The Princess of 72nd Street”; it was the only suggestion that fit the bill. When I asked Oyler how she came to know of the book, I got a sense of the novel’s following: she’d heard about it from a critic, Kaitlin Phillips, who was put on to it by the novelist Joshua Cohen. Cohen had heard of Kraf not from a writer but from a performer, the late Joel Gold, who, Cohen explained, “paid his bills as a cameraman and fashion photographer, but dedicated his life to performing, not as a standup so much as an improvising monologist in the Professor Irwin Corey/Lord Buckley tradition.”

“The Princess of 72nd Street” tells the story of Ellen, a bipolar artist who lives in Manhattan and paints “tangerines, brown teapots, rolls and books.” Much of the novel concerns her “radiances,” or manic episodes, when she becomes Esmeralda, who dresses in clothing with “flowers, cascades of color, or abstract designs,” plus medallions: an Egyptian ankh and “crushed metal found in the garbage.” She is proud and mad and charming, a star in the firmament who is often taken for “a hooker, Sabra, American Indian, actress, ballerina, witch, holy saint, mother, girl, mystic, ethereal spirit, bitch, earth goddess.” The Upper West Side that Esmeralda rules is “not a country for Nordic blondes of impeccable taste” but for “film makers who talk film but never make one, some film makers who actually do, residents who do nothing or once did something, actors and actresses waiting on line, overly casual psychologists, and a few self-made mystics”—people who drink and sleep and smoke together in tiny apartments that line “sooty streets with outdoor tables put right down among the garbage bags,” where the sunlight glitters off the grime.

The book is a high and a comedown at once—a paroxysm of sex and booze and, above all, color. It’s that rare thing: a true underappreciated classic. So why did Kraf never publish another book?

Kraf was born in the Bronx, in 1936, to a pair of lifelong New Yorkers, Harry and Lena Kraf, née Rosenfeld. Her father was a member of the New York State Senate from 1956 to 1965, and of the State Assembly from ’67 to ’72. (He got an obituary in the Times.) Elaine was their only daughter. In her early forties, she married a credit-and-collections consultant and poet named Martin Altman, who told me that his ex-wife—they divorced in 2002—had rejected her parents’ hopes that she would settle down with a businessman or a congressman’s son. Instead, she went to art school. Her father, Altman said, “would not attend her art shows or publishing events. He saw no value in art or the life of the mind.” But, he added, Elaine “had a creative force in her that strove to break the bonds that held it back, whether in art, writing, fashion.”

Altman and Kraf adopted a daughter, Milena Kraf Altman, who told me that her mother “reinvented herself every couple of years.” Kraf worked in special-education schools and, in 1986, became a principal at Astoria Blue Feather. Throughout the seventies and eighties, she painted and wrote. Her visual art, like her writing, often had a fragmentary quality. She made mixed-media portraits with “different textures and fabrics,” Milena said. “She would be walking down the streets of New York, and she would see an old drawer, and she would pick it up and be, like, ‘O.K., this is gonna be my canvas.’ ”

Kraf’s novels vary in style but share a handful of themes. She was fascinated, in particular, by those who deviate from social norms (artists, lunatics, circus performers) and by the methods used to keep social norms in place (psychoanalysis, mental institutions, lobotomies). All of the books feature a beautiful, isolated female protagonist of delicate sanity who is surrounded by untrustworthy men. “I Am Clarence,” her début, employs a series of disparate viewpoints to explore the relationship between a mentally ill mother, her suitors, and her disabled son. Like the main character in “The Princess of 72nd Street,” the mother is disintegrating, unable to find respect or love, and perhaps unable to give it, too. Her son, Clarence, is mocked and pitied. She lets a group of doctors experiment with him and possibly give him a lobotomy and, in the end, he is taken away.

Her second novel, “ The House of Madelaine" is altogether stranger: to the extent that it has a plot at all, it is about a woman who shares her first name with the author and is unable to escape the inhabitants of a house which belongs to a friend. Eventually, she is accused of murdering her friend’s husband, and faces an absurd trial; the novel’s most obvious influence is “Alice in Wonderland.” It is profoundly disorienting, like a recurring dream, the details of which keep escaping you. Passages seem to connect before lurching out of reach, as if disappearing, with the book’s characters, down the house’s central hallway, lined with Formica tables.

Kraf’s first two books were published by Doubleday, but, unsurprisingly, after “The House of Madelaine,” she left corporate publishing for independent houses. The Fiction Collective, which was run by a group of experimental writer-editors—including Ronald Sukenick, Jonathan Baumbach, B. H. Friedman, and Peter Spielberg—put out her third book, “Find Him!” Its narrator is an unnamed, childlike woman, who one day awakes dressed as a schoolgirl, unable to eat, speak, or clean herself without aid. Her caregiver is a man named Oliver, who alternately presents as her father, lover, captor, abuser, and teacher. Oliver, we learn, had a wife, Edith, who has vanished; it is strongly suggested that Edith is our narrator before she had a lobotomy. The text weaves together dreams, fantasies, and nightmares, and is broken up by musical notations and drawings. An unsettling meditation on patriarchal violence and the construction of femininity, the novel feels indebted to both Tillie Olsen and  Anaïs Nin, two of Kraf’s favorite authors, and deserves to be rediscovered as a significant work of feminist literature.

But, if there is one author who seems to act as a forebear for Kraf, it is Jean Rhys, whose work Kraf considered in an essay that she published in 1985. Rhys’s women, Kraf argues, are essentially a single character, a deteriorating figure who is a “victim of her self-destructive nature and of her dependence, for survival, upon men.” Rhys’s men, Kraf writes, while distinct, are generally loathsome, feckless, and chauvinistic.

It’s Rhys who comes to mind when reading “The Princess of 72nd Street,” with its unspooling account of how it feels to come apart when you were never really whole. At the beginning of the book, Ellen/Esmeralda has at least a degree of control, or if nothing else the illusion of it: she “projects a special dignity” no one would want to “defile or tamper with,” she says. She’s wrong, of course—wrong, Kraf seems to suggest, because she is a woman, wrong because that means that somebody, somewhere, will always want to defile or tamper with her dignity. When Ellen enters a radiance, the prose becomes frenetic, whirligig; we do not merely observe Esmeralda but race alongside her, across a Manhattan filled with jazz clubs and street performers and bright yellow sunlight. After this centrifugal rush, the return to earth, during her depressive periods, is wrenching. By the end, we have seen her exploited and abused, and the ache and tear of the novel comes in our recognizing that this has happened before she does. Although the book is wryly funny—“Anyone who wears a brassiere on West 72nd Street is suspect,” Esmeralda says, in one of many memorable declarations—it is also devastating.

In order to interest New Directions in publishing “The Princess of 72nd Street,” Kraf sent “letter after letter” to New Directions, Altman told me—“sort of quirky letters,” he added. They worked. In the first few years after the book was released, she wrote two more novels, with the working titles “Joachim and the Angels” and “The Final Delusions of Cinderella Korn,” and she hoped that New Directions would publish them, too. She told Peter Glassgold, an editor there, in a letter, that she had “forced out” the first of these books “during a difficult period.” The publishing house passed on that one, and also on “Cinderella Korn,” though Altman recalls that New Directions asked Kraf to rewrite it “at least twice, which she tried to do.” He got the impression from Kraf that the publisher “wanted something more like ‘The Princess of 72nd Street.’ ” Milena remembers her mother being relatively sanguine about her rejections. “She understood, I guess, the reasoning why,” Milena said. “And she just kept at it. She had a bunch of novels that she would try to get out there, but no one was picking them up.”

In another letter to Glassgold, Kraf wrote that she “never particularly liked ‘The Princess of 72nd Street’ as literature. In that,” she went on, “I guess our tastes are very different.” She was in her mid-forties, and had recently had a miscarriage and an accompanying intestinal virus; she was still recuperating. She described “The Princess of 72nd Street” as a “farewell to a part of my life composed of dreams and fantasies,” adding, “I was young for a long long time and now I am not young any longer.” She received a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, which gave her a year to work on “Cinderella Korn.” She later said that the book came from “the good, creative part” of her.

Milena said that her mother, near the end of her life, was working on a play about a woman who has, perhaps, seen her younger self in Central Park. She was “very determined to finish it,” Milena said. But, in 2011, Kraf was diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s. She died two years later. Kraf’s unfinished manuscripts, alongside starts and scraps of unrealized novels, sit in a storage space in Manhattan, which is “filled with so much of her artwork and her writings,” Milena told me. She has not yet been able to properly go through it all. ♦

Elaine Kraf wrote a cult classic. Then she was forgotten. By Hannah Williams. The New Yorker, July 28, 2022.