21/06/2024

Jack Gilbert : 20 Poems


 


 

 
 
 
Recovering Amid the Farms 
 
 
Every morning the sad girl brings her three sheep
and two lambs laggardly to the top of the valley,
past my stone hut and onto the mountain to graze.
She turned twelve last year and it was legal
for the father to take her out of school. She knows
her life is over. The sadness makes her fine,
makes me happy. Her old red sweater makes
the whole valley ring, makes my solitude gleam.
I watch from hiding for her sake. Knowing I am
there is hard on her, but it is the focus of her days.
She always looks down or looks away as she passes
in the evening. Except sometimes when, just before
going out of sight behind the distant canebrake,
she looks quickly back. It is too far for me to see,
but there is a moment of white if she turns her face.

 

 
Suddenly Adult
 
 
The train's stopping wakes me.
Weeds in the gully are white
with the year's first snow.
A lighted train goes
slowly past absolutely empty.
Also going to Fukuoka.
I feel around in myself
to see if I mind. Maybe
I am lonely. It is hard
to know. It could be
hidden in familiarity.

 

 

Rain

 

 

Suddenly this defeat.

This rain.

The blues gone gray

and yellow

a terrible amber.

In the cold streets

your warm body.

In whatever room

your warm body.

Among all the people

your absence.

The people who are always

not you.


I have been easy with trees

too long.

Too familiar with mountains.

Joy has been a habit.

Now

suddenly

this rain.

 

 

 

 

 

 

South 
 

In the small towns along the river

nothing happens day after long day.

Summer weeks stalled forever,

and long marriages always the same.

Lives with only emergencies, births,

and fishing for excitement. Then a ship

comes out of the mist. Or comes around

the bend carefully one morning

in the rain, past the pines and shrubs.

Arrives on a hot fragrant night,

grandly, all lit up. Gone two days

later, leaving fury in its wake.


For Susan Crosby Lawrence Anderson
 
 
 
 
 
 







Horses at Midnight Without a Moon

 

Our heart wanders lost in the dark woods.
Our dream wrestles in the castle of doubt.
But there’s music in us. Hope is pushed down
but the angel flies up again taking us with her.
The summer mornings begin inch by inch
while we sleep, and walk with us later
as long-legged beauty through
the dirty streets. It is no surprise 
that danger and suffering surround us.
What astonishes is the singing.
We know the horses are there in the dark
meadow because we can smell them,
can hear them breathing. 
Our spirit persists like a man struggling 
through the frozen valley
who suddenly smells flowers
and realizes the snow is melting
out of sight on top of the mountain,
knows that spring has begun.
 
 

Tear It Down


We find out the heart only by dismantling what
the heart knows. By redefining the morning,
we find a morning that comes just after darkness.
We can break through marriage into marriage.
By insisting on love we spoil it, get beyond
affection and wade mouth-deep into love.
We must unlearn the constellations to see the stars.
But going back toward childhood will not help.
The village is not better than Pittsburgh.
Only Pittsburgh is more than Pittsburgh.
Rome is better than Rome in the same way the sound
of racoon tongues licking the inside walls
of the garbage tub is more than the stir
of them in the muck of the garbage. Love is not
enough. We die and are put into the earth forever.
We should insist while there is still time. We must
eat through the wildness of her sweet body already
in our bed to reach the body within the body.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Going Wrong


The fish are dreadful. They are brought up

the mountain in the dawn most days, beautiful

and alien and cold from night under the sea,

the grand rooms fading from their flat eyes.

Soft machinery of the dark, the man thinks,

washing them. "What can you know of my machinery!"

demands the Lord. Sure, the man says quietly

and cuts into them, laying back the dozen struts,

getting to the muck of something terrible.

The Lord insists: "You are the one who chooses

to live this way. I build cities where things

are human. I make Tuscany and you go to live

with rock and silence." The man washes away

the blood and arranges the fish on a big plate.

Starts the onions in the hot olive oil and puts

in peppers. "You have lived all year without women."

He takes out everything and puts in the fish.

"No one knows where you are. People forget you.

You are vain and stubborn." The man slices

tomatoes and lemons. Takes out the fish

and scrambles eggs. I am not stubborn, he thinks,

laying all of it on the table in the courtyard

full of early sun, shadows of swallows flying

on the food. Not stubborn, just greedy.

 

 


 

 

Failing and Flying

Everyone forgets that Icarus also flew.
It’s the same when love comes to an end,
or the marriage fails and people say
they knew it was a mistake, that everybody
said it would never work. That she was
old enough to know better. But anything
worth doing is worth doing badly.
Like being there by that summer ocean
on the other side of the island while
love was fading out of her, the stars
burning so extravagantly those nights that
anyone could tell you they would never last.
Every morning she was asleep in my bed
like a visitation, the gentleness in her
like antelope standing in the dawn mist.
Each afternoon I watched her coming back
through the hot stony field after swimming,
the sea light behind her and the huge sky
on the other side of that. Listened to her
while we ate lunch. How can they say
the marriage failed? Like the people who
came back from Provence (when it was Provence)
and said it was pretty but the food was greasy.
I believe Icarus was not failing as he fell,
but just coming to the end of his triumph.

 
 

 

 

 

A Year Later


for Linda Gregg

From this distance they are unimportant
standing by the sea. She is weeping, wearing
a white dress, and the marriage is almost over,
after eight years. All around is flat
uninhabited side of the island. The water
is blue in the morning air. They did not know
this would happen when they came, just the two
of them and the silence. A purity that looked
like beauty and was too difficult for people.


 
 
I Imagine the Gods 
 
I imagine the gods saying, We will
make it up to you. We will give you
three wishes, they say. Let me see
the squirrels again, I tell them.
Let me eat some of the great hog
stuffed and roasted on its giant spit
and put out, steaming, into the winter
of my neighborhood when I was usually
too broke to afford even the hundred grams
I ate so happily walking up the cobbles,
past the Street of the Moon
and the Street of the Birdcage-Makers,
the Street of Silence and the Street
of the Little Pissing. We can give you
wisdom, they say in their rich voices.
Let me go at last to Hugette, I say,
the Algerian student with her huge eyes
who timidly invited me to her room
when I was too young and bewildered
that first year in Paris.
Let me at least fail at my life.
Think, they say patiently, we could
make you famous again. Let me fall
in love one last time, I beg them.
Teach me mortality, frighten me
into the present. Help me to find
the heft of these days. That the nights
will be full enough and my heart feral.


 
 

Going There
 
 
Of course it was a disaster.
The unbearable, dearest secret
has always been a disaster.
The danger when we try to leave.
Going over and over afterward
what we should have done
instead of what we did.
But for those short times
we seemed to be alive. Misled,
misused, lied to and cheated,
certainly. Still, for that
little while, we visited
our possible life.
 
 


 
The Forgotten Dialect of the Heart
 
How astonishing it is that language can almost mean,
and frightening that it does not quite. Love, we say,
God, we say, Rome and Michiko, we write, and the words
get it all wrong. We say bread and it means according
to which nation. French has no word for home,
and we have no word for strict pleasure. A people
in northern India is dying out because their ancient
tongue has no words for endearment. I dream of lost
vocabularies that might express some of what
we no longer can. Maybe the Etruscan texts would
finally explain why the couples on their tombs
are smiling. And maybe not. When the thousands
of mysterious Sumerian tablets were translated,
they seemed to be business records. But what if they
are poems or psalms? My joy is the same as twelve
Ethiopian goats standing silent in the morning light.
O Lord, thou art slabs of salt and ingots of copper,
as grand as ripe barley lithe under the wind's labor.
Her breasts are six white oxen loaded with bolts
of long-fibered Egyptian cotton. My love is a hundred
pitchers of honey. Shiploads of thuya are what
my body wants to say to your body. Giraffes are this
desire in the dark. Perhaps the spiral Minoan script
is not laguage but a map. What we feel most has
no name but amber, archers, cinnamon, horses, and birds.
 

 

Michiko Dead

 

He manages like somebody carrying a box   

that is too heavy, first with his arms

underneath. When their strength gives out,   

he moves the hands forward, hooking them   

on the corners, pulling the weight against   

his chest. He moves his thumbs slightly   

when the fingers begin to tire, and it makes   

different muscles take over. Afterward,

he carries it on his shoulder, until the blood   

drains out of the arm that is stretched up

to steady the box and the arm goes numb. But now   

the man can hold underneath again, so that   

he can go on without ever putting the box down.



 

Alone

 

I never thought Michiko would come back

after she died. But if she did, I knew

it would be as a lady in a long white dress.

It is strange that she has returned

as somebody's dalmatian. I meet

the man walking her on a leash

almost every week. He says good morning

and I stoop down to calm her. He said

once that she was never like that with

other people. Sometimes she is tethered

on their lawn when I go by. If nobody

is around, I sit on the grass. When she

finally quiets, she puts her head in my lap

and we watch each other's eyes as I whisper

in her soft ears. She cares nothing about

the mystery. She likes it best when

I touch her head and tell her small

things about my days and our friends.

That makes her happy the way it always did.

 

     





 

 

 

Summer at Blue Creek, North Carolina

 

There was no water at my grandfather's

when I was a kid and would go for it

with two zinc buckets. Down the path,

past the cow by the foundation where

the fine people's house was before

they arranged to have it burned down.

To the neighbor's cool well. Would

come back with pails too heavy,

so my mouth pulled out of shape.

I see myself, but from the outside.

I keep trying to feel who I was,

and cannot. Hear clearly the sound

the bucket made hitting the sides

of the stone well going down, but never the sound of me.



They Call It Attempted Suicide

My brother's girlfriend was not prepared for how much blood
splashed out. He got home in time, but was angry
about the mess she had made of his room. I stood behind,
watching them turn into something manageable. Thinking
how frightening it must have been before things had names.
We say peony and make a flower out of that slow writhing.
Deal with the horror of recurrence by calling it
a million years. The death everywhere is no trouble
once you see it as nature, landscape, or botany.




Say You Love Me

 

Are the angels of her bed the angels
who come near me alone in mine?
Are the green trees in her window
the color I see in ripe plums?
If she always sees backward
and upside down without knowing it
what chance do we have? I am haunted
by the feeling that she is saying
melting lords of death, avalanches,
rivers and moments of passing through.
And I am replying, "Yes, yes.
Shoes and pudding."


 The Abnormal is not Courage

 

The Poles rode out from Warsaw against the German
Tanks on horses. Rode knowing, in sunlight, with sabers,
A magnitude of beauty that allows me no peace.
And yet this poem would lessen that day. Question
The bravery. Say it's not courage. Call it a passion.
Would say courage isn't that. Not at its best.
It was impossible, and with form. They rode in sunlight,
Were mangled. But I say courage is not the abnormal.
Not the marvelous act. Not Macbeth with fine speeches.
The worthless can manage in public, or for the moment.
It is too near the whore's heart: the bounty of impulse,
And the failure to sustain even small kindness.
Not the marvelous act, but the evident conclusion of being.
Not strangeness, but a leap forward of the same quality.
Accomplishment. The even loyalty. But fresh.
Not the Prodigal Son, nor Faustus. But Penelope.
The thing steady and clear. Then the crescendo.
The real form. The culmination. And the exceeding.
Not the surprise. The amazed understanding. The marriage,
Not the month's rapture. Not the exception. The beauty
That is of many days. Steady and clear.
It is the normal excellence, of long accomplishment.

 

 


 

 

 

A Brief for the Defense

 

Sorrow everywhere. Slaughter everywhere. If babies
are not starving someplace, they are starving
somewhere else. With flies in their nostrils.
But we enjoy our lives because that’s what God wants.
Otherwise the mornings before summer dawn would not
be made so fine. The Bengal tiger would not
be fashioned so miraculously well. The poor women
at the fountain are laughing together between
the suffering they have known and the awfulness
in their future, smiling and laughing while somebody
in the village is very sick. There is laughter
every day in the terrible streets of Calcutta,
and the women laugh in the cages of Bombay.
If we deny our happiness, resist our satisfaction,
we lessen the importance of their deprivation.
We must risk delight. We can do without pleasure,
but not delight. Not enjoyment. We must have
the stubbornness to accept our gladness in the ruthless
furnace of this world. To make injustice the only
measure of our attention is to praise the Devil.
If the locomotive of the Lord runs us down,
we should give thanks that the end had magnitude.
We must admit there will be music despite everything.
We stand at the prow again of a small ship
anchored late at night in the tiny port
looking over to the sleeping island: the waterfront
is three shuttered cafés and one naked light burning.
To hear the faint sound of oars in the silence as a rowboat
comes slowly out and then goes back is truly worth
all the years of sorrow that are to come.

 

 

The Great Fires

 

Love is apart from all things.

Desire and excitement are nothing beside it.

It is not the body that finds love.

What leads us there is the body.

What is not love provokes it.

What is not love quenches it.

Love lays hold of everything we know.

The passions which are called love

also change everything to a newness

at first. Passion is clearly the path

but does not bring us to love.

It opens the castle of our spirit

so that we might find the love which is

a mystery hidden there.

Love is one of many great fires.

Passion is a fire made of many woods,

each of which gives off its special odor

so we can know the many kinds

that are not love. Passion is the paper

and twigs that kindle the flames

but cannot sustain them. Desire perishes

because it tries to be love.

Love is eaten away by appetite.

Love does not last, but it is different

from the passions that do not last.

Love lasts by not lasting.

Isaiah said each man walks in his own fire

for his sins. Love allows us to walk

in the sweet music of our particular heart.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 Jack Gilbert - 1925 - 2012

 

When Jack Gilbert won the Yale Younger Poets prize in 1962 for Views of Jeopardy, he attained a kind of allure usually foreign to poets. His photo was featured in Esquire, Vogue, and Glamour, and his book was often stolen from the library. A Guggenheim Fellowship enabled him to go to Europe; he spent much of the ensuing two decades living modestly abroad. Although the literary world embraced him early in his career, he was something of a self-imposed exile: flunking out of high school; congregating with Allen Ginsberg and Jack Spicer in San Francisco but never really writing like a Beat poet; living in Europe and writing American poetry inspired by Pound and Eliot.

A self-described “serious romantic,” Gilbert had a relationship with poet Linda Gregg, and was later married to sculptor Michiko Nogami, who died after 11 years of marriage. Many of his poems are about these relationships and losses. Gilbert’s fourth book, Refusing Heaven (2005), contains, as poet Dan Albergotti describes, “poems about love, loss, and grief that defy all expectations of sentimentality. All of them are part of the larger poem, the poem that is the life of the poet, perhaps the most profound and moving piece of work to come out of American literature in generations.”

Refusing Heaven won the National Book Critics Circle Award, and Gilbert’s work has also received a Lannan Literary Award for Poetry and a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. His second book of poetry, Monolithos (1982), won the Stanley Kunitz Prize and the American Poetry Review Prize. Despite these awards, some critics have ignored or dismissed Gilbert, and critic Meghan O’Rourke, writing for Slate in 2005, pondered why: “Gilbert isn’t just a remarkable poet. He’s a poet whose directness and lucidity ought to appeal to lots of readers . . . the poet who stands outside his own time, practicing a poetics of purity in an ever-more cacophonous world—a lyrical ghost, you might say, from a literary history that never came to be.”

In an essay he wrote to introduce his own work in the anthology New American Poets of the Golden Gate (1984), Gilbert pointed to the spareness of his work: “I am by nature drawn to exigence, compression, selection,” he wrote. “One of the special pleasures in poetry for me is accomplishing a lot with the least means possible.” Publishing only four books since he began writing over 50 years ago reinforces for his readers Gilbert’s love of economy. In a 2006 interview on NPR, he reflected on his relatively sparse list of publications: “It’s not a business with me . . . . I’m not a professional of poetry, I’m a farmer of poetry.”

Poetry Foundation

 

 

 


On the rare occasions when Jack Gilbert gives public readings—whether in New York, Pittsburgh, or San Francisco—it is not unusual for men and women in the audience to tell him how his poems have saved their lives.

The fascination with Gilbert is a response, above all, to the power of his poetry, but it also reflects the mystique of a life lived utterly without regard for the conventions of literary fortune and fame.
In 1962 Gilbert’s first book, Views of Jeopardy, won the Yale Younger Poets Prize and was considered for the Pulitzer Prize alongside collections by Robert Frost and William Carlos Williams. The New York Times called Gilbert “inescapably gifted,” Theodore Roethke and Stanley Kunitz praised his candor and control, and Stephen Spender hailed his work as “witty, serious, and skillful.”
"All Jack ever wanted to know was that he was awake—that the trees in bloom were almond trees—and to walk down the road to get breakfast,” Gregg, who remains close to Gilbert, says. “He never cared if he was poor or had to sleep on a park bench.”
“Jack rises up like an eel,” says Alice Quinn, The New Yorker’s poetry editor. “He dictates how and when the world sees his poems.”
During the day, my mother and father went into town, leaving my siblings and me all alone in this magnificent house, three stories high and no one there but us. We played on the roof, in the laundry chutes. It was extraordinarily dangerous. It was lovely, legendary. We owned that little world. In the back of the house were two orchards, one filled with peaches, the other with apples. We were always in the apple trees—frequently falling down.
INTERVIEWER
Do you think you would have become a poet if you’d stayed in Pittsburgh?

GILBERT
Why not? I was kind of a strange boy to be in Pittsburgh. I spent so much time reading. Even if I started a book that was boring, it was almost impossible for me not to finish it. I couldn’t get the story out of my head until I knew what happened. I had such curiosity. And you might not think it, but the power of Pittsburgh, the grandeur, those three great rivers, was magnificent. Even working in the steel mills. You can’t work in a steel mill and think small. Giant converters hundreds of feet high. Every night, the sky looked enormous. It was a torrent of flames—of fire. The place that Pittsburgh used to be had such scale. My father never brought home three pounds of potatoes. He always came home with crates of things. Everything was grand, heroic. Everything seemed to be gigantic in Pittsburgh—the people, the history. Sinuousness. Power. Substance. Meaningfulness.
INTERVIEWER
Were you surprised when your first book, Views of Jeopardy, won the Yale Younger Poets Prize and was considered for the Pulitzer?

GILBERT
Sure. It was an accident.

INTERVIEWER
Is it true that they couldn’t find you to tell you that you’d won?

GILBERT
It was more of an accident than that. I had gone to Italy and fallen in love—for the first time—with an extraordinarily beautiful woman, but her sister convinced me that I should give her up. She said, You’re never going to hold a job. You’re not going to be able to support Gianna. She should have babies. Gianna was made to have babies. And it was true. But that was an awful thing for me to do; I should have talked it over with Gianna. Anyhow, I was gathering all of my things to leave Italy. Gianna’s brother-in-law—Cleve Moffet, a writer—had an application for some kind of competition. He talked about it but decided he wasn’t going to do anything with it. When he got up to go to lunch he picked up the form and threw it in my lap saying, You should do it. I forgot about it until I was leaving to go back to America. The application must have gotten mixed in with the stuff I was packing. When I got to New York and was throwing things away, I must have found it and sent it in. I don’t know. I forgot about it. Later, I was living in the East Village and this one night there was pounding on the door and there was Cleve standing in the hall. He was agitated and said, They’re looking all over for you. I asked who, and he explained that somebody wanted to give me the Yale prize. I didn’t know what to do, how to express it. I took him out with my two friends and we had milkshakes. The next day I roamed about trying to find a way to feel about what had happened. I finally lay down under the Brooklyn Bridge to try to feel something. I lay there all afternoon, and then I called the people at Yale.
You were only thirty-seven years old.
INTERVIEWER
You went abroad soon afterwards—to Greece on a Guggenheim Fellowship. Did success influence your decision to go? Were you running away from something?

GILBERT
It wasn’t that. I didn’t want to stay in New York and go to dinners. I was also puzzled by the fact that so many of the established poets didn’t like each other. There’s competition, naturally—and naturally you relate to someone who can promote you. That’s not awful; that’s the way the world works. It’s just not the way I work. But don’t get me wrong, what they’re doing—these meetings where they give each other prizes—I think it’s wonderful.

INTERVIEWER Really?

GILBERT
Yes. The people who are famous have earned it; they’ve earned it to an extraordinary degree. They’ve given their lives to it, they’re professionals, they work hard, and they raise families. And they’re very smart, they stay at their desks all the time—they send out everything. They teach, which is not easy. What they do is important, but there’s no way that I would use my life for that.
INTERVIEWER
Do you think it’s important for American writers to live abroad?

GILBERT
At least at some point—so you have something to compare to what you think is normal, and you encounter things you aren’t used to. One of the great dangers is familiarity.
INTERVIEWER
When you were abroad, did you consider yourself an expatriate?

GILBERT
No. You have to understand I didn’t visit places; I lived places. It makes all the difference in the world.
INTERVIEWER
Did being removed from the literary community benefit you?

GILBERT
Sure.

INTERVIEWER
What did you like most about it?

GILBERT
Paying attention to being alive. This is hard—when I try to explain, it sounds false. But I don’t know any other way to say it. I’m so grateful. There’s nothing I’ve wanted that I haven’t had. Michiko dying, I regret terribly, and losing Linda’s love, I regret equally. And not doing some of the things I wanted to do. But I still feel grateful. It’s almost unfair to have been as happy as I’ve been. I didn’t earn it; I had a lot of luck. But I was also very, very stubborn. I was determined to get what I wanted as a life.
INTERVIEWER
When you lived overseas, did you get up every day and write?

GILBERT
If I was in an extraordinary place, I didn’t want to take out my notebook and start writing down what the front of the pagoda looked like. I wanted to experience it before I wrote it down.
A couple of decades ago, I finished going all the way around the world. And after that I suddenly realized I had lived all of my dreams. I had lots of them and I’ve fulfilled them all. Now it’s time to live the adult dreams, if I can find them. The others were dreams from childhood—first love and such, which is wonderful. It’s interesting to discover that we don’t have adult dreams—pleasure and pride, but not really adult dreams. Let me try to explain. I have a poem, “Trying to Have Something Left Over,” in which I’ve been unfaithful to my wife and she knows it and she’s mad. It’s the last night and I’m going to say goodbye to Anna, the other woman. She’s had a baby—not by me—and her husband has left her because he couldn’t take all that muck of a baby being born. This is the last night I’ll ever see her and I feel incredibly tender and grateful and loving toward her. And we’re not in bed—previously we had a wild relationship. Anyway, here’s the last night to say goodbye. She’s cleaning house quietly and sadly, and I’m entertaining her boy, her baby, throwing him up in the air and catching him. It’s a poem about that. Sad and tender. A truly adult dream. Profound tenderness. That’s what I like to write as poems. Not because it’s sad, but because it matters. So much poetry that’s written today doesn’t need to be written. I don’t understand the need for trickery or some new way of arranging words on a page. You’re allowed to do that. You’re allowed to write all kinds of poetry, but there’s a whole world out there.
INTERVIEWER
My Mother Taught Me, an erotic novel, wasn’t it?

GILBERT
It’s about sexuality. You have to understand, people were writing sex books but no one was writing them well. I thought pornography should be as much of a genre as cowboy stories. But pornography is boring. Childish. Unhealthy. I thought, Why not have a novel of sexuality that’s not paralyzed by the need for orgasm? So I wrote a good pornographic novel to show it could be done. An enjoyment rather than a momentary excitement. There were so many pornographic novels written; why weren’t they effective? A momentary spasm. Some people will have an orgasm if you say a dirty word or say, What he did to her body was … But what if you approach it as a real novel? The idea of entertainment intrigued me at the time—so I wrote one.
INTERVIEWER
Did school influence you as a young writer?

GILBERT
No, I failed high school; I got into college by mistake. I failed freshman English eight times. I was interested in learning, but I wanted to understand too, which meant I was fighting with the teachers all the time. Everybody accepted the fact that I was smart but I wouldn’t obey. I didn’t believe what they said unless they could prove it.
INTERVIEWER
In your interview with Gordon Lish in Genesis West, you say that there are two kinds of poetry. On the one hand, there are poems that give delight; on the other, there are poems that do something else. What do you mean by “something else”?

GILBERT
I think serious poems should make something happen that’s not correct or entertaining or clever. I want something that matters to my heart, and I don’t mean “Linda left me.” I don’t want that. I’ll write that poem, but that’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about being in danger—as we all are—of dying. How can you spend your life on games or intricately accomplished things? And politics? Politics is fine. There’s a place to care for the injustice of the world, but that’s not what the poem is about. The poem is about the heart. Not the heart as in “I’m in love” or “my girl cheated on me”—I mean the conscious heart, the fact that we are the only things in the entire universe that know true consciousness. We’re the only things—leaving religion out of it—we’re the only things in the world that know spring is coming.
INTERVIEWER
How do you start a poem?

GILBERT
There’s no one way. Sometimes I’m walking along the street and I find it there. Sometimes it’s something I’ve been thinking about. Sometimes it’s an apparition.

INTERVIEWER
How do you know when you’ve finished one?

GILBERT
If I’m writing well it comes to an end with an almost-audible click. When I started out I wouldn’t write a poem until I knew the first line and the last line and what it was about and what would make it a success. I was a tyrant and I was good at it. But the most important day in my career as a writer was when Linda said, Did you ever think of listening to your poems? And my poetry changed. I didn’t give up making precreated poetry, but you have to write a poem the way you ride a horse—you have to know what to do with it. You have to be in charge of a horse or it will eat all day—you’ll never get back to the barn. But if you tell the horse how to be a horse, if you force it, the horse will probably break a leg. The horse and rider have to be together.
INTERVIEWER
Is that why your style is unadorned and not ornamental?

GILBERT
Oh, I like ornament at the right time, but I don’t want a poem to be made out of decoration. If you like that kind of poetry, more power to you, but it doesn’t interest me. When I read the poems that matter to me, it stuns me how much the presence of the heart—in all its forms—is endlessly available there. To experience ourselves in an important way just knocks me out. It puzzles me why people have given that up for cleverness. Some of them are ingenious, more ingenious than I am, but so many of them aren’t any good at being alive.
GILBERT
There were people I respected, but we weren’t fighting. Today, you have to do something to distinguish yourself. Maybe because there’s so much money in poetry now. We used to type our poems and then go around and nail them up. Nobody would give Allen Ginsberg any money for “Howl.” It wasn’t in the running.

…One day, he got on a bus and went across the Golden Gate Bridge to see me in Sausalito. The streets turned to lanes, and the lanes to gravel, and the gravel turned into a path and then just woods. Up and up. He finally reached the abandoned house where I was living. After we talked, he said he had something he wanted to show me. He got two pages out of his bag. I read them and then read them again. I looked at him and told him they were terrific. Those two pages eventually became “Howl.”
INTERVIEWER
Some of the Beat writers used drink and drugs to spur their work. What about you?

GILBERT
I did smoke tobacco for about a week when I was thirteen. It was boring. I was never interested in chemicals making me excited or loving or happy. It’s like with sexual stimulants—it would make me feel as if someone else were making love to the woman I was with. I want to be the person making love to her, not the chemical.
INTERVIEWER
Many writers talk about how difficult it is to write. Is poetry hard work?

GILBERT
They should try working in the steel mills in Pittsburgh. That’s a very delicate kind of approach to the world—to be so frail that you can’t stand having to write poetry. There are so many people who are really in trouble just making a living, who are really having a hard life. Besides, with poetry you’re doing it for yourself. Other people are doing it because they have to feed the babies. But I do understand that it’s hard to write, especially if you have a family.
INTERVIEWER
When you write, do you read your poems out loud?

GILBERT
Sometimes. If my instincts register that something is wrong with the rhythm then I work on it, but it’s almost always unconscious. The hard part for me is to find the poem—a poem that matters. To find what the poem knows that’s special. I may think of writing about the same thing that everyone does, but I really like to write a poem that hasn’t been written. And I don’t mean its shape. I want to experience or discover ways of feeling that are fresh. I love it when I have perceived something fresh about being human and being happy. Ezra Pound said “make it new.” The great tragedy of that saying is he left out the essential word. It should be make it importantly new. So much of the time people are just aiming for novelty, surprise. I like to think that I’ve understood, that I’ve learned about something that matters—what the world should be, what life should be.
INTERVIEWER
You’ve said before that you don’t miss being young.

GILBERT
Oh, of course I miss being young.

INTERVIEWER
How is that different from not minding growing old?

GILBERT
Growing old is a mistake. It seems natural that we die and grow old. It’s part of the bargain. You get to be young for a long time and then you start to get old. It’s also a wonderful time, but it’s a different kind of wonderful. When I was young, I was very aware of death. I was determined not to die until I’d lived my life. So much so that I used to pray and make lists. I would say, I know you have to take me away. You have to kill me. But not yet. I’d make a sort of bargain—I accept that you will kill me, but don’t let me die before I’ve fallen in love. And then the second prayer was, Don’t let me die a virgin. I started making lists about what I wanted before I died. When I finally finished going around the world, I discovered that I’d lived every one of those lists.
INTERVIEWER
So discipline is important to you?

GILBERT
Yes, because I’m lazy. If you have it in you, you want to create, but I won’t force myself—because it’s dangerous. People who are organized are in danger of making a process out of it and doing it by the numbers.
INTERVIEWER
Have you ever thought of writing your memoirs?

GILBERT
Yes. Every once in a while someone asks to do it for me. Sometimes I’m interested because I’ve forgotten so much of the past and I like the idea of walking through my life. What’s more, it’s a profound experience to be with people from my past again. To be with my memories. Things that I thought I’d forgotten all of a sudden become visible, become present.

INTERVIEWER
Like a film?

GILBERT
Different than that. It’s more like a feeling rising from the tops of my knees. Then I start remembering. It’s complicated; a child seldom remembers anything before he’s four years old. I just wonder how much I know, how much I’ve been through, that I no longer remember.
INTERVIEWER Do you still wake happy but aware of your mortality

GILBERT Yes, though sometimes I have to have a cup of tea first.

 

         

Highlights from The Art of Poetry No. 91: Jack Gilbert.  Interview Sarah Fay.  The Paris Review, Issue 175, Fall-Winter 2005.


 

 

 

 
Internet sources  :

Poets.org

Poetry Foundation

Another Hand Live Journal 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17/06/2024

Oscar Wilde in Hollywood

 

 


 

 

Hollywood is haunted by the ghost of playwright and novelist Oscar Wilde. But how did Wilde, who died over a decade before the first feature film, help to make the movies? 

Join Kate Hext, associate professor of English literature at the University of Exeter and author of the new book "Wilde in the Dream Factory: Decadence and the American Movies", for a lively discussion about Oscar Wilde’s hitherto unknown influence on US cinema. This conversation is hosted by Andrew Rimby, host and director of The Ivory Tower Boiler Room. 

In the decades after his imprisonment for his sexuality, the playwright and raconteur Oscar Wilde helped to make Hollywood movies racy and queer. His quips and style inspired the new screenwriters and directors, offering a way to put sex in the air in an era of increasing restrictions on what could be shown onscreen. Set within the rich, evolving history of the American screen, this salon reveals Wilde’s influence on Hollywood from the silent movies to screwball comedies – and changes forever how we understand both Wilde’s afterlife and cinema’s beginnings.

Wilde in Hollywood, or How the Golden Age Got Naughty with Kate Hext and Andrew Rimby

Interintellect , May 8, 2024



Dark Room - Kate Hext -- Wilde in the Dream Factory

Kate Hext of the University of Exeter joins us to talk about the tremendous influence of Oscar Wilde in the first days of Hollywood cinema.

Art of Darkness, March 23, 2024




Hollywood is haunted by the ghost of playwright and novelist Oscar Wilde. This is the story of his haunting, told for the first time. Set within the rich evolving context of how the American entertainment industry became cinema, and how cinema become the movies, it reveals how Wilde helped to shape Hollywood in the early twentieth century.

It begins with his 1882 American tour, and traces the ongoing popularity of his plays and novel in the early twentieth century, after his ignominious death. Following the early filmmakers, writers and actors as they headed West in the Hollywood boom, it uncovers how and why they took Wilde's spirit with them. There, in Hollywood, in the early days of silent cinema, Wilde's works were adapted. They were also beginning to define a new kind of style -- a 'Wilde-ish spirit', as Ernst Lubitsch called it -- filtering into the imaginations of Lubitsch himself, as well as Alla Nazimova, Ben Hecht, Samuel Hoffenstein and many others. These were the people who translated Wilde's queer playfulness into the creation of screwball comedies, gangster movies, B-movie horrors, and films noir. There, Wilde and his style embodied a spirit of rebellion and naughtiness, providing a blue-print for the charismatic cinematic criminal and screwball talk onscreen.

Discussing films including Bringing Up Baby, Underworld, and Laura, alongside definitive adaptations of Wilde's works, including, The Picture of Dorian Gray, Lady Windermere's Fan, and Salome, Wilde in the Dream Factory revises how we understand both Wilde's afterlife and cinema's beginnings.



 


 

After Wilde’s visit to the US in 1882, his philosophy of life became an inspiration to early filmmakers in their revolt against corporate America, Wall Street and provincial pettiness

The Importance of Being Earnest was NBC’s first coast-to-coast broadcast of a play in 1929. It was ideal for radio, partly because Oscar Wilde’s crisp dialogue obviated any need of facial expressions or gestures. Epigrammatic speech, as Noël Coward found, was a signifier of modernity in the 1920s. Beyond that, as Kate Hext shows, the America of Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover had a sinewy and hardy sympathy for the Anglo-French fin-de-siècle literary mode of the 1890s known as Decadence.

For too long, Hext argues, historians have focused on the American Dream as a mercenary business, concerned with the optimisation of personal wealth, sociopathic ambition, competitive ruthlessness, grinding long hours of work, mass production, cultural uniformity, winners and losers and he-men and patsies. Yet, she continues, Wilde, shorn of his sexual deviance and disassociated from pretty boys, offered a philosophy of life that was an antidote to corporate America, Wall Street, provincial pettiness and meddlesome neighbours. His state of mind gave a sort of subversive hope to men and women – especially those in the Midwest and West – who hankered to live more for pleasure than profit. Putting the sexual history aside, Wilde’s writings were a gallant and inspiriting counter to killjoys and the insatiable demands of wage slavery. Wilde satisfied a yearning for non-monetary fulfilment and recreational rapture.

The Picture of Dorian Gray, says Hext, is the story of a habitual criminal. In pursuit of his ideal of perfect beauty and voluptuous living, Gray steals, blackmails, uses opium, visits dens of iniquity, performs illegal sexual acts, learns the tricks of coiners and commits murder. He becomes, in Wilde’s depiction, a dandy criminal performing acts of fabulous duplicity. As such, Gray is a harbinger of that dominant 20th-century phenomenon, the cinematic crime thriller.

Some gay American men were drawn to Wilde by his sexual history and public tragedy. Vincente Minnelli, a descendant of Sicilian revolutionaries who grew up in Delaware, Ohio, was enthralled by Wilde while working as a teenage window-dresser in Chicago. He became a set designer, then a theatre director, always touched by the visual inflexions of the Decadents. After 1940, as ‘the Oscar Wilde of the camera’, he directed the greatest Hollywood musicals at the apogee of their fashion.

Wilde’s subversive strains also appealed to men of conventional sexual habits. Although H. L. Mencken disliked the idea of buggery, he admired Wilde’s baiting of puritans and emulated his aphoristic put-downs of women. Wilde’s work was readily adaptable to the tastes of vaudeville audiences who whooped and whistled at drag artists. There were similar frissons, no doubt, in the Nickelodeon film Salome, or the Dance of the Seven Veils (1908) and spin-offs such as If You Had a Wife Like This (1909).

Hext gives a rich and fulfilling account of the Hollywood screenwriter and crypto-Wilde, Ben Hecht. Born into a Yiddish-speaking family which ran a small store in Racine, Wisconsin, he was heterosexual. But his sympathy always lay with miscreants, anti-bourgeois dandies, dissidents, unsuccessful smart alecs and no-hopers. While a reporter on the Chicago Daily News in 1914-23, he modelled himself on Baudelaire, and read Verlaine and Mallarmé. The decadence of Dorian Gray and of Huysmans’s À rebours delighted him.

The Front Page (1928), the boisterous comedy about a Chicago newsroom which Hecht co-wrote, depicts hard-bitten hacks reading Huysmans, Gautier, Arthur Symons, Walter Pater and other Decadent writers. Hecht’s snappy film-scripts lift lines and sentiments from A Woman of No Importance and Lady Windermere’s Fan. In Crime Without Passion (1934), the male lead recites verses from Swinburne’s sadomasochistic poem ‘Dolores’ (1866). In Mad Love (1935), Peter Lorre, playing the murderous Dr Gogol, declaims ‘The Ballad of Reading Gaol’ at the film’s homicidal climax.

Hecht’s gangster aesthetes dominate his scripts for such classic films as Underworld (1927), Little Caesar (1931) and Scarface (1932). The he-men in these films are rash, hypersensitive and perfectionist in their wishes and nihilistic in practice. They have a self-harming need of excitement, regardless of the price. One of Hecht’s narrators says that they ‘lie, quibble, cheat, steal, four-flush and kill, each and all inspired by the solacing mono-mania that every one of their words and gestures is a credible variant of perfection’. Their exacting taste drives them to the merciless, inhuman pursuit of precious objects. In the expectation of an early death, they want immediate gratification, not deferred pleasures. They prefer sudden exhilaration to stability. A cinematic culmination of Wilde’s gangster aesthetes is Edward G. Robinson taking the lead role in a Hollywood adaptation of one of Wilde’s stories, ‘Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime’.

The thesis of Wilde in the Dream Factory invites scoffing before one reads it. But Hext is a subtle, observant, lively and persuasive writer. She knows her stuff and never takes it too solemnly. Her book is a winner.

The curious influence of Oscar Wilde on Hollywood. By Richard Davenport-Hines. The Spectator, March 23, 2024.

 

 

 


 

On New Year’s Eve, 1922, a most unusual film premiered at the Criterion Theatre, one of the new “picture palaces” on Broadway. Though there was no red carpet, perhaps a sense of expectation filled the chilly December air. Inside the 600-seat movie theatre was at capacity. As the screen titles appeared the Wurlitzer organ stopped playing. This was a silent picture to be played in a completely silent auditorium.

The film was Salome, and Alla Nazimova – so famous she used only her surname – was its star, scenario writer and producer. She had overseen every aspect of this picture, the final act in modernism’s annus mirabilis, a late entry on the roster of artworks that sought to “make it new” in a year that redefined literature and the arts. But Salome turned out to be a failure, and Nazimova’s disappointed ambition put paid to her career, if not her legend.

She was born in Yalta in 1875 and first made her name as a leading actress in the Moscow Art Theatre. When she arrived in Hollywood, via New York, as “The Great Nazimova”, she played opposite Rudolph Valentino in Camille (1921). Hollywood’s studios were expanding, the moving pictures were becoming the movies and the culture seemed to welcome female-led production companies. Nazimova Pictures was one of these “Her-Own Companies”, and Salome mattered to its boss. She fought to realize her vision of it at every turn: from filming at night to get just the right lighting effects, and dealing with the threat of censorship, to negotiating on endless delays in nationwide distribution and organising the publicity.

It was based on the 1891 play by Oscar Wilde, originally published with illustrations by Aubrey Beardsley. After a false start in America – Richard Strauss’s 1907 opera Salome closed after one performance at the Metropolitan Opera – Wilde’s heroine became an underground sensation. Maud Allan started it all with her touring Salome show. The papers called it “Salomania”. Filtered through vaudeville, the story of a young woman who performs the Dance of the Seven Veils for King Herod in return for the head of Jokanaan (which she longs to kiss) was irresistible. America’s Salome became orientalised, voluptuous, up for it. Imitators proliferated. Theda “The Vamp” Bara played her in the first feature-length film adaptation; Irving Berlin wrote a song about her; Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle did a cross-dressed Salome skit in which he kissed a head of lettuce.

When Nazimova’s Salome appeared on screen, though, the audience gasped at an adaptation that looked very different: avant-garde and queer as America’s Salome had rarely been. The distinction between avant-garde cinema and the movies may have been blurred in the early 1920s. Even so, this was outlandish. The court of King Herod was multiracial, some actors cross-dressed and reportedly all were gay. Narraboth and the Page, two of Salome’s admirers, appeared in peacock-feathered leggings and canonical pom-pom wigs, teamed with over-sized pearl necklaces on their bare chests.

The mise en scène took up the extravagant curved lines of Beardsley’s boldest two-tone patterns for a design that quivered into camp. However, the designer, Natacha Rambova, replaced the original illustrator’s phallic symbolism – candelabra, swords, erect plant stems – with yonic symbols of circles, archways and veiled entrances. The entry to Jokanaan’s cistern was reimagined as a gilded cage, over which Salome draped herself. A contemporary review reassured its readers that “only the highest of the highbrows will perceive … unwholesome aspects”. For those highbrows, features such as the arched and gilded cage were an artistic coup – a mons veneris at the centre of the set.

This was a promising, if singular, start. Sex was in vogue in 1922, the year in which Hollywood’s decadence reached a climax: Arbuckle went on trial twice for the manslaughter of the starlet Virginia Rappe at an orgy; Cecil B. DeMille filmed the first lesbian kiss in Manslaughter; and Universal released Erich Von Stroheim’s Foolish Wives, the first film to cost more than a million dollars (and almost bankrupt a studio), much of it spent on shooting 60 hours of erotic encounters with a cast of thousands. In the same year the anonymously published polemic Sins of Hollywood: An exposé of movie vice! salivated over the way the movie world made “the scarlet sins of Sodom and Babylon, of Rome and Pompeii fade into a pale yellow”.

In this sensational kind of view Nazimova was a key figure in Hollywood’s immorality. She was an original member of Los Angeles’s “Sewing Circle”, the society of lesbian and bisexual women that later included Greta Garbo. The Sewers met under the palm trees at Nazimova’s palatial home, 8080 Sunset Boulevard, surrounded by an orange grove, an aviary, a rose garden and tropical flowers. The pool was in the shape of the Black Sea, with underwater lighting. On the terraces she chatted with a changing cast of starlets, including Norma Talmadge, Jean Acker and Pola Negri. The Sunday-afternoon parties were all-female affairs, with masquerade games creating an environment ripe for sexual conquest. On other occasions Nazimova gathered together her Russian émigré friends: Sergei Prokofiev recalled how, in 1921, they still sang “God Save the Tsar” to welcome in the Russian New Year.

The “scarlet sins” of Hollywood were good box office. Had Nazimova stuck to those, she might have had a long career at the top. Anyone can forgive a good-time girl. Or, in another possible universe, the Beardsleyesque design of her film could have been rolled into the carnivalesque momentum of a surreal comedy. In the event, however, Nazimova’s Salome showed little interest in the uninhibited pleasures associated with the Sewing Circle or contemporary Hollywood. It was – to borrow T. S. Eliot’s words to Virginia Woolf – “trying something harder”, and that was the problem. Wilde had been the first writer or artist to endow Salome with an inner life, and now Nazimova sought to express this on the silent screen.

We first see Salome on screen turning from Herod’s advances and flouncing off in a sparkling minidress. Then, slowly, she comes to life as a three-dimensional figure: not a Jazz Age femme fatale, but a determined, vulnerable woman. The camera lingers on her as she gazes through kohl-rimmed eyes, and the audience sees that she has lost herself in desirous longing; looking at Jokanaan, but beyond him, too, to something intangible. Narraboth watches her and the Page watches him, each desiring another in vain, their androgynous bodies playing with the possibility of same-sex desire.

Salome’s inner life had never before been explored so tenderly. It had rarely been noticed at all among the more obvious visual delights of Salomania. The photographer Charles Van Enger experiments with new close-up and continuity editing techniques to create a visual grammar of desire that burns with eros and pain. Wilde’s words and a score would only have distracted. For Nazimova understood that it is the feelings we cannot articulate that haunt us. Seen through a lens that attends to such feelings more than to Salome’s body, we see that she is too fragile to withstand Herod’s desires, never mind her own.

This all makes for an unusual Dance of the Seven Veils, because it’s missing an essential ingredient: eroticism. In the filmed performance, flapperesque in a tight white miniskirt (a screen first) Salome begins, motionless, holding her translucent veils to her face. She is gamine, not curvaceous; and 43 years old, no teenager. Eschewing the orientalized moves of earlier Salome dances, Nazimova turns to ballet, the dance form of her Russian roots. In slippers with toes turned out, she half-chassés self-consciously, hiding behind her veils. Salome should be audacious, but she is anxious, a reluctant sex object. As she gathers momentum her movement turns to desperation and she whirls about – eyes wide and wild – before falling to the ground.

Kenneth Anger, arch mythologizer of silent Hollywood and its sexual mores, was unimpressed. “In Nazimova’s version of Salome’s Dance”, he later wrote, “old Herod didn’t get his money’s worth!” Perhaps not, but that was hardly Nazimova’s aim. As the camera cuts from Salome to Herod, laughing, panting with satisfaction, the king is shown to be ridiculous: a parody of desire measured against Salome’s vicissitudes of longing. The kiss, when it comes, is an anticlimax, taken unseen beneath Salome’s cloak. For Nazimova knows the truth of Wilde’s quip in Lady Windermere’s Fan, the play he finished alongside Salome: “There are only two tragedies. One is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.”

Salome put female subjectivity at its centre to make desire new, or to try. It wasn’t really a failure at all. It was an artistic triumph. Still, with the hindsight of a century, it’s clear that it was an outlier in the entertainment industry. Film moguls may have taken refuge in literary adaptations and half longed for the artistic cachet of Europe, but they were also businessmen. Unfulfilled desires and indecorously emotional women were far from ideal. Salome’s distributors were also concerned that the film would fall foul of morality regulations set down in 1922 by the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America. They needn’t have worried. Salome’s transgressions were too obscure for the censors; those of her auteur-creator were not. Still, despite enthusiastic reviews after the Criterion premiere, a larger release was delayed well into 1923, and when it came it was limited. Hollywood wanted sex, but nothing too highbrow or queer. The only thing less tolerable than an emotional woman was a pretentious one. When studio heads drew up a list of 117 film stars whose private lives made them morally “unsafe”, the list included Nazimova – and her career as a screen star was effectively over.

Within a few years Nazimova was forced by financial difficulties to rent a villa in the grounds of the hotel that had once been her home, now renamed The Garden of Allah. She’d spent her fortune on Salome. The poolside bar became popular with writers and stars, including Charlie Chaplin, Errol Flynn, Ernest Hemingway and Dorothy Parker. Nazimova revived her Broadway career, most famously starring as Mrs Alving in Henrik Ibsen’s Ghosts. There were bit parts in Hollywood too. The party, though, was over. In 1959 the Garden of Allah was demolished, its loss allegedly one of the inspirations for Joni Mitchell’s “Big Yellow Taxi”.

Salome was not quite the end of Nazimova’s life on screen. Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard (1950) begins with a struggling screenwriter, Joe Gillis (William Holden), stumbling upon a decaying mansion. Inside 10086 Sunset Boulevard, Norma Desmond (Gloria Swanson), once the greatest star of silent cinema, is planning a triumphant comeback. She has written a screenplay and intends to star in it. “It’s the story of Salome,” she declares. “I think I’ll have DeMille direct it.” Franz Waxman’s score quotes Strauss, while Norma’s white peacock feathers are borrowed from Rambova’s costuming. Sunset Boulevard pivots around Norma’s vision of her Salome movie, as she emotionally blackmails Joe to help with the screenplay. The role is far too young for her, as it was for Nazimova; her ambition will destroy them both.

Nazimova did not live to see Sunset Boulevard. She died at the Garden of Allah in 1945. Wilder’s movie is an ambivalent tribute, neither a version of her story nor a fair mythical substitute. Was she, like Norma, destructive and delusional? No, that narrative has been corrected by scholars of early cinema. Does she deserve a place in accounts of how art was made new in 1922? Yes, but that omission has not been made good. Perhaps she is just too close to pop culture for avant-garde-focused modernism, just as she was too avant-garde for Hollywood. In spring 1923, as she battled to get her film into cinemas, she was philosophical about its legacy. “If we have made something fine, something lasting, it is enough”, she told an interviewer, her characteristic verve giving way to a sense of weary resignation with which – 100 years after Salome’s premiere – many women will still identify.

Seven veils, no sex. A pioneering Hollywood production of Salome that baffled the film studio. By Karen Hext. The Times Literary Supplement, December 23/30, 2022.